I don't believe he said manc.He's not saying "Manc". There isn't any confusion here. Do you think he's saying Manc?
Last week there was an initial still photograph of a banana skin lying on the edge of a football pitch with Aubameyang 20ft in the background, a few hours later another was released showing it on the floor in front of a bunch of Woolwich players. There wasn't a single piece of "live" footage of the act of it being thrown from the Spurs fans let alone from the individual culprit. Whilst it would have been odd for it to have been thrown by a Woolwich fan there was no proof from the photograph that it wasn't. My defence (it wasn't actually a defense it was a call to wait and see before pointing the finger) last week was you need to see the act taking place, then you need to prove it was racially motivated and I said if the guy that's thrown it shouted something racist then that's him banged to rights. None of which was in anyway evident to anyone viewing a still photograph. As it turned out, it was right to stand back and wait until it was investigated.
But if, take Sterling out of this for now, he came out saying he said manc, and those around him backed him up, would you take him at his word?
Because that is all we did last week. Took a man and people around him at his word.