He can only damage ligaments that are still attached to the bone. His previous ligament damage means that he has NO ligaments to be injured, ligaments do not repair themselves like muscle tissue, once they have been snapped that's it, they are gone for good (there is a surgery that can take ligaments from somewhere else in your body and those can be fused into place, which of course Kane hasn't had this). In addition to a snapped ligament they can also get stretched, I don't know if these shorten back over time, but my understanding is they don't.Honest feeling that Kane doesn't have ligament damage. He didn't roll it over too bad looking at the replays and the studs from Delph may have exaggerated the pain. Here's hoping he'll only need some swelling to subside.
So, he might have sustained new damage to his ligaments that remain by either stretching those or snapping those. In this case, he will almost certainly be out for the rest of the season.
However, you are right in that he could be back because you can't damage ligaments that you haven't got left to damage. Remember Bale, he would roll his ankle over to almost 90 degrees and be back playing after a couple of weeks, this was because he had no ligaments left to injure.
All guesswork of course as it isn't known just how badly he injured his ankle previously. This is a weak point now for his entire career, it's not a major thing other than losing precious game time.
Last edited:
