Of all the players he could take a pop at, he takes a pop at Tanguy Ndombele.
Absolute joke.
Huh?
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Of all the players he could take a pop at, he takes a pop at Tanguy Ndombele.
Absolute joke.
Defend this comment from Poch you bunch of absolute fucking morons
This is disgraceful.
This is disgraceful.
If anybody has difficulty sleeping tonight watch this...
And this is the take from the guy that asked the question.
He's ridiculousMeanwhile, Pochettino has warned that Tottenham’s new signings — Tanguy Ndombele, Giovani Lo Celso and Ryan Sessegnon — will need at least 18 months, or even two years, before they can regularly produce their best football for the club.
“For me, when you sign a player, despite the amount you pay, with the profile of Tanguy Ndombele or Giovani Lo Celso or Ryan Sessegnon you need minimum one year and a half, or two years,” said Pochettino.
Well that's cheered me up no end......He always seems to be trying to buy time lately.
Link
Mauricio Pochettino compares himself to a 'producer' as he admits concern over Spurs Amazon documentary
Mauricio Pochettino has revealed his and his squad’s concern at being filmed for an access-all-areas documentary this season, saying that he now feels like a “producer” as well as a football manager.www.telegraph.co.uk
“For me, when you sign a player, despite the amount you pay, with the profile of Tanguy Ndombele or Giovani Lo Celso or Ryan Sessegnon you need minimum one year and a half, or two years,” said Pochettino.
No excuse mate, just a factual interpretation from the journo that asked the actual question.Always an excuse
This is disgraceful.
No excuse mate, just a factual interpretation from the journo that asked the actual question.
I've seen you write many, many times on here arguing with people about selecting elements from what the manager says, being selective with what you want to take from an interview, whilst ignoring the entire interview or having it misrepresented with a media spin to something else.
I find it important and relevant to post what the journo who asked the question and therefore actually sat in the fucking though and interpreted his answer as that which I posted. If you chooice to ignore that that's absolutely fine by me, I don't give a shit about it, just screams as hypocrisy from you though.