No levy would refuse to buy a gun too expensive but Jose would get a pea shooter so similar to what is happening now.Dig at levy
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
No levy would refuse to buy a gun too expensive but Jose would get a pea shooter so similar to what is happening now.Dig at levy
Why the fuck didn't we renew his contract?
Would he or would he not have played a low block had Kane and Son played last night? Y/N.
All the evidence supports that he would have played in exactly the same way, not just on his games already with us but when he was at previous clubs whilst having a superior Team and against an inferior opposition (namely how he set up against Sevilla) this is how he plays. This is his football. With Son and Kane both playing he would have had us play exactly as we did last night. Maybe the quality of Kane and Son might have nicked us something but Leipzig would have still pressed us off the pitch, they would still have created all those chances as a result, they would have still been the better team as a consequence.
If there was a plan with having two up then I can be comfortable with this. What I mean by a plan is if we had identified a CB to target, have Dele & Lucas target that weak link, both play on his shoulder, have the log balls target specifically this CB, or if he is not good in possession then allowing him to take the ball before pressing him, or have the ball played down his channel all night and run him into the ground.What annoys me the most is knowing he didnt have a striker he still set up with that low block 442. It's always going to be a struggle for moura and alli up there but he gave them no chance. They were totally isolated. It's almost like he set up to accentuate the problem.
1) I'm suggesting that that a 20m top goalscorer for his team for the past four years with a 0.47 strike rate in one of the world's toughest leagues striker would be better striker than Lamela, Lucas, Dele, Bergwijn, yes
2) Why do you assume that if we buy a striker he will be a "waste of money low quality failure" when you don't apply that classification to any of the players we actually buy?
3) You haven't answered my question. How was it possible for you to say mid-way through the transfer window that it would be unacceptable for us not to bring a striker in yet do a 180º turn on the spot and say we didn't need one as soon it was clear that we'd failed to do just that?
I don't buy it. If you plan ahead you will never lack options. If you leave it to the last day of the transfer window you will get fucked. Somehow alot of spurs fans think its just bad luck or high prices that prevent us from signing premium players. It is not. It is gross incompetence. We could had Grealish for £25m but no. Prime example
We were said to be scouting Guirassy last weekend. Plays for Amiens. Plenty of pace, works hard, good technique and a nuisance with his back to goal. Price said to be £18m. And I am giving him my seal of approval.1) Playing a striker with a lower goals per game ratio than the player he replaces - Son, Dele makes us worse, it's why Llorente was only used as a last resort.
2) Because our history off signing low price strikers is a disaster .... you know the list.
3) It is a massive fail that Spurs, Barcelona, Chelsea and Man Utd all didn't get strikers, worse for us as we've needed one for 18 months, however they don't grow on trees, Bergwijn adds to our options but granted he's not a specialist striker .... who was available?
We do need a striker let's not even pretend we don't, what we don't need is another "Llorente" level striker who adds very little, that was Spurs 2017 we are a whole new level now. This summer we must sign a quality young striker to play with or as back-up to Kane ... but they don't grow on trees, and the very best will cost >100M .... that's not going to be easy.
Just to wind you up for laughs ........Although it sounds like that's exactly what you're doing.
Imagine going into January with no fit goalkeepers then rather than sign one we try wing it through the season with Jan or a Toby in goal?
The point I’m making is that in 2020 Jose’s tactics aren’t a sustainable path to success. Literally no top side play with that style save for perhaps A. Madrid. That should tell you something.
Would he or would he not have played a low block had Kane and Son played last night? Y/N.
All the evidence supports that he would have played in exactly the same way, not just on his games already with us but when he was at previous clubs whilst having a superior Team and against an inferior opposition (namely how he set up against Sevilla) this is how he plays. This is his football. With Son and Kane both playing he would have had us play exactly as we did last night. Maybe the quality of Kane and Son might have nicked us something but Leipzig would have still pressed us off the pitch, they would still have created all those chances as a result, they would have still been the better team as a consequence.
If Jose was more expansive, it would have ended like the Bayern game, their players were very quick and we couldn’t cope. This is still Poch’s team not Jose’s. It’s work in progress Rome wasn’t built in one day.This post basically articulates my thoughts much more eloquently than I could.
Swap the managers last night and we win.
I didn’t want Jose but I’m prepared to give time, I just wish he could be more expansive with the way he approaches games.
Well another side to the story. But i believe we could have got him for a reasonable price back when. Who is Bill?Prime bullshit Bill, Aston Villa were taken over and the new owners refused to sell Grealish ... facts not fiction Bill ... Villa then achieved promotion and any chance of signing Grealish cheap vanished. We made a 25m bid they laughed us off.
Aston Villa will not sell Jack Grealish cheaply after new investment in club
Do you honestly think Villa didn't have other interested buyers willing to pay more than 25m? was Grealish some sort of well kept secret only Spurs knew about?
It's the same as claiming Willian Jose was available for 22m ... if so there would have been a dozen buyers, he has a buy-out clause of €70m so why would Sociedad sell for two thirds off? by all accounts they wanted €25m up front with add-ons rising to €40m, he's just not proven to be that good.
Barca could have bought him yesterday by paying the buy out clause, they went for Braithwaite instead.
The font of all fake news from Spain ... quotes the Spanish media like they were gods when in fact they are on a par with the Sun and the Daily Mail ... or probably even worse more bullshit than Montana.Well another side to the story. But i believe we could have got him for a reasonable price back when. Who is Bill?
Sorry i could not read that wall of text. It just makes no sense.The font of all fake news from Spain ... quotes the Spanish media like they were gods when in fact they are on a par with the Sun and the Daily Mail ... or probably even worse more bullshit than Montana.
Transfer Gossip is great fun we all get involved, but when the facts are know after the window closes (as with Grealish) to keep referring to crazy media reports from before as if they were still 'facts' that carries no credibility.
The whole transfer business has turned on it's head, clubs no longer have massive scouting networks of people scouring the globe, instead they use freelancers who supply the same player profiles to dozens of clubs. In most cases it's now the agent supplying the profile going to the club and offering his players, any decent youngster now has an agent from about 10 onward ... child exploitation?
There are no 'secret deals' unless the money is scary huge, agents will always try and play clubs off against each other - it's why you get the BS about Eriksen about signing for X,Y,Z club when only Italy and Spain were ever going to be his destination, and even then only three or four clubs. It's just agent hype to push up the price.
Players and their agents have nearly all the power, days of Chairmen doing secret deals are long gone, Levy tried it with Bale and the agent blew him out the water. We use the same system as most big clubs, a transfer committee agrees on the player type we want for example - 23-25, striker, good hold up, good in the air, good presser - then those details go to freelance scouts and player agents, who then make their pitch.
I'm told Steve Hitchin gets literally hundreds of player details a week from every corner of the globe ... sorting the gems from the shit is now the real skill.
Dude you keep hitting the excuse level.We played without our two best players and goal threats yet still had 3-4 very good chances to score that we should have done better with. Bergwijn, Lo Celso and Lucas on two occasions on another day could and should have done better. I saw a lot of promise last night from a team trying to find its way without their two talismen for the first time this season. I think we pushed and probed well in the latter stages given the circumstances.
Dude you keep hitting the excuse level.
We play crapsville football for 70 mins nearly every game. It's boring , long ball , dated and We should have been 5 nil down before we even looked liked we had any urgency.
No doubt we would be better with those 2 back but Mourinhos football is from the dark age .
Do you need private reading tuition? I believe you'll find being able to read is quite important on a written forum.Sorry i could not read that wall of text. It just makes no sense.