The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
If Son had a job description it might read:Again it’s performances over results.
Saying Son was good because he scored is like saying we have been good every time we’ve won.
Even more absurd
Agreed - some of the ‘bigger’ players (Kane and Son fell into this, too) are taking the games on their shoulders and over-thinking / over-trying.I think in some ways this is actually part of the problem. He's getting so frustrated during the game that he's trying too hard and overdoing things. He actually just needs to relax and keep things simple. That's when it'll come together.
Moura is doing the same, they are pushing so hard for a goal they're hitting a wall of defenders and not seeing the simple passes or runs.
So as I said, when we win games you won’t have a single complaint.If Son had a job description it might read:
Score goals
Create chances for others.
He did this over that four week period. The fact that our defence shipped more goals that Son scored is hardly down to Son.
Him being 'garbage for ages' is just plain wrong. As for Gedson over Son...
If Gedson is playing better than Son, why should Son play ahead of him?
And by the way here is the quote mikes01666
I’d that something you agree with?
Picking names over performance? You must have loved Poch
So just like Poch, you’d pick a name even if Son wasn’t playing well, or not scoring, and Gedson was.We're all aware of of your anti-Pochettino agenda. In the early days he was the best thing that happened to this club since Keith Burkinshaw.
Oh and just to make it absolutely clear, I'd pick Son every day of the week ahead of Gedson.
Yeah exactlysammyspurs has winners mentality, of course.
So just like Poch, you’d pick a name even if Son wasn’t playing well, or not scoring, and Gedson was.
Would you also pick an out of form injured Kane who hadn’t kicked a ball for 2 months over his stand in who just scored a hat trick in the game before?
Of course you would. Losers mentality.
That’s why we lost.
Context.Yeah exactly
Manager who’s won nothing in 11 years?
Manger who has won 22 major trophies in 20 years?
Mull that over then tell me who’s the loser
Gedson has shown no consistent evidence of 'playing well'. So Son every time.
It's great being wise after the event and the reason we lost the CL final was due to picking Kane. No mention of Sissoko handling the ball in our area in the first minute?
Unlike others here, I would have played Kane even in 70% fit. Also I'd do it again. He's a better player than Lucas (even injured and out of form), end of.
That's why I'd choose Son over Gedson. He's a better player, end of. Time will tell if Gedson can get even within a mile of Son.
Times changeContext.
Mourinho coached Porto (best of Portugal), Chelsea, Madrid, Inter, United...
Pochettino coached Espanyol, Southampton and Tottenham.
Different stories etc..
Of course Mourinho is career wise better, but I'm not sure how many clubs would pick Jose over Poch nowadays.
Times changes, so does football. Mourinho is winner, but he needs to change, quickly or we're fucked.
Treble, yeah right mate, United fans were delighted with that treble looooooooooolTimes change
Jose won a treble three years ago then took 18 months off.
Poch came 3rd while Wes Morgan lifted the title
No. Under almost any circumstance I would play Son instead of Gedson. He's a better player.So that’s a lot of words to not answer a question
If Son was playing poorly and Gedson was playing well, you would drop Gedson for Son?
I'm sorry Mike even Harry Kane is not a better player than Lucas injured and out of form. It's a moot point because we will never no what would have happened had Lucas started that game, but to simply deem a player better under any circumstances is daft.Gedson has shown no consistent evidence of 'playing well'. So Son every time.
It's great being wise after the event and the reason we lost the CL final was due to picking Kane. No mention of Sissoko handling the ball in our area in the first minute?
Unlike others here, I would have played Kane even in 70% fit. Also I'd do it again. He's a better player than Lucas (even injured and out of form), end of.
That's why I'd choose Son over Gedson. He's a better player, end of. Time will tell if Gedson can get even within a mile of Son.
No. Under almost any circumstance I would play Son instead of Gedson. He's a better player.
Now Gedson has to prove me wrong.
Well, we'll just have to disagree.I'm sorry Mike even Harry Kane is not a better player than Lucas injured and out of form. It's a moot point because we will never no what would have happened had Lucas started that game, but to simply deem a player better under any circumstances is daft.
Treble, yeah right mate, United fans were delighted with that treble loooooooooool
Dele thrives in a good team. His movement and his tricks work well when his team has plenty of the ball and players who can find his runs.
His form is a symptom of our problems, not a cause.