Tbf, it wouldn't matter anyway. There has been an abundance of evidence shown to refute his climate change denial and he refuses to read it. So what's the point? Evidence means nothing to the lad.Here's an example :
Ahab has made a number of statements in this post and I genuinely have no idea if they are factual or not.
But nobody has said that they're BS, incorrect, and produced evidence that they are BS, they've only ignored the points and attacked the poster.
Of course it could be argued thatAhab has not produced evidence of them being factual either, but that is a different thing to attacking the poster.
