Massively - you can get more players forward and be difficult to play againstI used to think that playing with 3 CBs was negative, but I have since changed my mind. If you have got CBs who are good on the ball, it can be sexual.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Massively - you can get more players forward and be difficult to play againstI used to think that playing with 3 CBs was negative, but I have since changed my mind. If you have got CBs who are good on the ball, it can be sexual.
And what does that have to do with Valverde? Valverde is not Nuno. Their track records are not similar at all.APparently this was Paratici's argument in favour of Nuno, highlighting his spell at Valencia. Look how that is playing out:nunofacepalm:
Gil for Tanguy, Rodon for Sanchez and thats roughly what i'd go for in league games for the time being.If you've shipped 9 goals in 3 games it makes sense to "shore up the defence".
HugoEmerson can be switched out for Tanganga. And Tanguy or Son can be switched out for Gil. But some form of variation of that is probably our strongest 11 right now.
Romero, Sanchez, Dier
Emerson,Pierre, Skipp, Reguilon
Tanguy
Kane, Son
I guess it depends on the opponent. Against some opponents Tanguy's dribbling would be of use.Gil for Tanguy, Rodon for Sanchez and thats roughly what i'd go for in league games for the time being.
Christian Gross, to his credit, didn't lose against Woolwich. He only played in one NLD which was a 1-1 draw against one of the best Woolwich teams in the last 25 years.
For the sake of the argument and the debate, where do we draw the line on what is and is not a defensive manager?After this no more fucking defensive managers ever again please. Just no, AVB, Graham, Jose, Nuno, it’s not Spurs and it will never be Spurs. How long does it take to get through into the clubs head this message, are they thick or something.
Levy talked about DNA then appointed a fucking Italian. You know the country that prides itself on DEFENCE. The new guy is a fall guy nothing more and you are falling for it hook line and sinker.
Just think too many players have failed too often under 3 different managers and we need to make them understand they're done here. Tanguy is one of those. I concider it a bit like Poch after we lost at home to Stoke in his first season and the penny dropped on Kaboul, Capoue and Adebayor. Lets get some fresh blood in the team and see what they can do.I guess it depends on the opponent. Against some opponents Tanguy's dribbling would be of use.
Hell. Against some you drop Kane in as the 10 and have Gil and Son in front of him.
Apart from at Barcelona and Olympiakos his teams don't score enough goals. Nuno has had similar issues with goals scored. It's because their philosophies are similar in that they place a great emphasis on defending, being solid, and not on creative attacking play that leads to chances and goals. The majority of fans have had enough of this.And what does that have to do with Valverde? Valverde is not Nuno. Their track records are not similar at all.
Trouble is we don’t. Harry fit = Harry playsHell. Against some you drop Kane in as the 10 and have Gil and Son in front of him.
For the sake of the argument and the debate, where do we draw the line on what is and is not a defensive manager?
Like, are Conte and Tuchel, who's styles are built on a mid block and aggressive counters defensive managers? Would Valverde, who has a strong defensive but a methodic and well thought out attacking system by classed as defensive? Where is the line drawn?
Because if it is drawn behind Pochettino then I think that we are writing off most managers on the planet.
By Harry dropping in as the 10 I meant Harry plays as the 10 behind the attack. Not Harry drops onto the bench.
It might make us more solid from a defensive POV, but because we lack CBs who are comfortable on the ball, there's every chance we'd be still be as ugly as hell in possession, and the danger with someone like Nuno is that it would end up being a flat back 5 a lot of the time. The other complicating factor is our midfield. I can't see how we can put together a satisfactory midfield from our available options. We don't have a single midfielder I would not sell.We have a manager who is used to setting up and coaching a 3 at the back system. We have multiple defenders who are used to playing in a 3 at the back system. Yet we don't use it.
At this point it is worth a gamble.
Ah I see. I think the point stands though. I really begin to feel like he is one of the issues.By Harry dropping in as the 10 I meant Harry plays as the 10 behind the attack. Not Harry drops onto the bench.