Bound to be one of them cousin shaggers from Norwich.Who is patient zero? Find them and off with their head!
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Bound to be one of them cousin shaggers from Norwich.Who is patient zero? Find them and off with their head!
...but that wasn't OUR problem, was it?We need to stop acting like victims.
The reason we had to play West Ham with the shits was because they had the FA Cup final the following week. They were, rightly, unwilling to play a midweek game before that final where Liverpool would have had the whole week to prepare. And the rules then were that the league had to finish before the FA Cup final.
AND Big Martin Jol didn't have to pick players who couldn't keep the shit inside, they didn't all have it. It would have made more sense to pick lesser players who could run without crapping their shorts.
Other than that one incident, a lifetime ago, why do so many of you think we have been treated less fairly than other teams?
Don't want to derail this thread entirely but for me there is a clear pecking order in this division and its historically been weighted towards the bigger clubs. Perhaps we have even benefitted slightly from this ourselves when we play the clubs lower down the pecking order - could be debated.We need to stop acting like victims.
The reason we had to play West Ham with the shits was because they had the FA Cup final the following week. They were, rightly, unwilling to play a midweek game before that final where Liverpool would have had the whole week to prepare. And the rules then were that the league had to finish before the FA Cup final.
AND Big Martin Jol didn't have to pick players who couldn't keep the shit inside, they didn't all have it. It would have made more sense to pick lesser players who could run without crapping their shorts.
Other than that one incident, a lifetime ago, why do so many of you think we have been treated less fairly than other teams?
They don't make the decision.sky sports talking about it as if the games will go ahead and we have to cope with it.
If we didn't play it would have gone down as a 3-0 loss. We could have taken that option....but that wasn't OUR problem, was it?
As you say: "they were, rightly, unwilling to play a midweek game before that final"
...and the FA duly obliged.
Good for them, they shouldn't have qualified for the Final if they didn't want a fixture pile-up!
But guess what, WE should've been (quite RIGHTLY) unwilling to play a game where three quarters of the team couldn't stand up without shitting, vomiting, or both!
But WE didn't get the choice. THAT'S the difference.
...and 15 years ISN'T a lifetime ago... Unless we're using Medieval life expectancy and infant mortality rates!!
Don't want to derail this thread entirely but for me there is a clear pecking order in this division and its historically been weighted towards the bigger clubs. Perhaps we have even benefitted slightly from this ourselves when we play the clubs lower down the pecking order - could be debated.
We've been on the end of so many dodgy decisions through the years particularly against the bigger sides that I don't think its a case of paranoia or conspiracy theories.
Back then Woolwich had David Dein in charge and he had his tongue lodged firmly in some powerful people's arseholes. Its no co-incidence that his departure marked their decline.
I can also remember the cameras going to a room in Highbury where there were tons of FA and PL officials all celebrating Woolwich making top 4 with the alcohol flowing. You could say perhaps they were celebrating the final match at Highbury, but I don't recall similar scenes when we departed the old WHL.
Let's just say if nothing else that was terrible optics.
Not trying to claim we are victims but historically we haven't benefitted as much as the likes of Man Utd, Liverpool, Woolwich. I think that's very clear.
Imagine if we are down to 13. We put out whoever is fit.
Gollini, Scarlett, Markanday, Rodon et al for the next 3 games. Smash the oppo and play total Conte ball.
This is when legends are born!!
I'm aware of that.They don't make the decision.
Imagine if we are down to 13. We put out whoever is fit.
Gollini, Scarlett, Markanday, Rodon et al for the next 3 games. Smash the oppo and play total Conte ball.
This is when legends are born!!
Agree and it was Ivan Toney.
We need to stop acting like victims.
The reason we had to play West Ham with the shits was because they had the FA Cup final the following week. They were, rightly, unwilling to play a midweek game before that final where Liverpool would have had the whole week to prepare. And the rules then were that the league had to finish before the FA Cup final.
AND Big Martin Jol didn't have to pick players who couldn't keep the shit inside, they didn't all have it. It would have made more sense to pick lesser players who could run without crapping their shorts.
Other than that one incident, a lifetime ago, why do so many of you think we have been treated less fairly than other teams?
There have been so many down through the years, and I've also forgotten so many.List them.
Not playing/refusing to play is not the same as asking the game to be delayed by 24hrs, at LEAST so the players could wipe their arses and rehydrate!!If we didn't play it would have gone down as a 3-0 loss. We could have taken that option.
Reassures me that they will in fact be cancelledsky sports talking about it as if the games will go ahead and we have to cope with it.
Or the FA think Levy is a twat and aren't interested in Spurs... I mean, we all think he's a twat.. :contethumb:Don't want to derail this thread entirely but for me there is a clear pecking order in this division and its historically been weighted towards the bigger clubs. Perhaps we have even benefitted slightly from this ourselves when we play the clubs lower down the pecking order - could be debated.
We've been on the end of so many dodgy decisions through the years particularly against the bigger sides that I don't think its a case of paranoia or conspiracy theories. Who can forget Pedro Mendes where the ball was a good 2 feet behind the goal line? An endless string of "soft" penalty decisions at Old Trafford, Stamford Bridge, Anfield down through the years.
Back then Woolwich had David Dein in charge and he had his tongue lodged firmly in some powerful people's arseholes. Its no co-incidence that his departure marked their decline.
I can also remember the cameras going to a room in Highbury where there were tons of FA and PL officials all celebrating Woolwich making top 4 with the alcohol flowing. You could say perhaps they were celebrating the final match at Highbury, but I don't recall similar scenes when we departed the old WHL.
Let's just say if nothing else that was terrible optics.
Not trying to claim we are victims but historically we haven't benefitted as much as the likes of Man Utd, Liverpool, Woolwich. I think that's very clear.
lols, watch them romp it 6-0No need... Play the kids, genuinely. None of our first team really wanna play this fixture... So let's take advantage....
Under 23's squad are doing alright.... Let them get some European experience!
Gobbygonk multi?Don't want to derail this thread entirely but for me there is a clear pecking order in this division and its historically been weighted towards the bigger clubs. Perhaps we have even benefitted slightly from this ourselves when we play the clubs lower down the pecking order - could be debated.
We've been on the end of so many dodgy decisions through the years particularly against the bigger sides that I don't think its a case of paranoia or conspiracy theories. Who can forget Pedro Mendes where the ball was a good 2 feet behind the goal line? An endless string of "soft" penalty decisions at Old Trafford, Stamford Bridge, Anfield down through the years.
Back then Woolwich had David Dein in charge and he had his tongue lodged firmly in some powerful people's arseholes. Its no co-incidence that his departure marked their decline.
I can also remember the cameras going to a room in Highbury where there were tons of FA and PL officials all celebrating Woolwich making top 4 with the alcohol flowing. You could say perhaps they were celebrating the final match at Highbury, but I don't recall similar scenes when we departed the old WHL.
Let's just say if nothing else that was terrible optics.
Not trying to claim we are victims but historically we haven't benefitted as much as the likes of Man Utd, Liverpool, Woolwich. I think that's very clear.
Gobbygonk multi?