Chelsea had their debts written off because their owner was the subject of sanctions by the entire western world for his role in destabilising Russia and the global order. That’s not nothing - it’s the consequence of dirty money in football.
Your criticism is that the leadership put long term gains above short term gains but that is always the most rational course of action. It doesn’t help your emotions but it is the right thing to do. OR perhaps you are ignoring the fact that we were building a stadium? It’s hard to tell which from your post.
The perfect owners don’t exist - they’re a figment of your imagination. The best owners need to do it all and that’s not possible in the real world as it is.
ENIC cannot win or lose us trophies. That’s literally not their role. The only owners who can do that are those who have hundreds of millions to throw at the club over a few years. It is coaches and players who win trophies. ENIC’s role is to ensure the club is run well enough that the real can perform to a high level and that the team consistently progress over the long term. Our presence in many finals is evidence that we’ve had competitive teams. No club’s progress is linear over the long term. There are always ups and downs, even for corrupting influences like Man City, Chelsea and PSG!
We have become a far stronger club on and off the pitch over time under ENIC’s watch. That is clear and they deserve respect for that. Let’s push for more and better but to suggest ENIC are the problem is just lunacy.