No, it doesn't suggest that. I think we need 4 quality attacking options, even if we play the minimum number of games, because there are also injuries to consider. I was just pointing out that it's highly unlikely we will play 60+ games, as you suggested, and offered a number I think we'll end up playing. That's all, really. Nothing more to read into it than that.
ok but I think we need to plan to play as many games as we can - and not be limited by player availability, and hence the calculations to work out how many games we might need to play and hence that if we do go deep then both Kane and Son need back up (as well as Kulusevski) ...... and my guess is Moura and Bergwijn is too much of a drop in quality plus Bergwijn seems likely to move on.
All of which suggests a good quality 4th attacker to cover Kane/Son and their goals , and even a 5th attacker to potentially replace Bergwijn, possibly another a wide player.