Dele I thought had an escalation on the fee subject to number of performances , a criteria he seems unlikely to meet
Yeah so if he’s unlikely to meet that criteria, can’t they take the value Dele’s worth off the price off Richarlison?
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Dele I thought had an escalation on the fee subject to number of performances , a criteria he seems unlikely to meet
I watch Richardson twice a year. Can anyone explain what sort of player he is?
Sounds like he would be a great signingall rounder he is quick, can dribble, pass, hold up the ball, link, score, also hyper competitive.
He doesn’t have the out and out finishing of Kane or Son or the vision of Kulu but he is strong in every area and so can play striker and winger. He would give us total cover of all attacking roles.
That's what the equity injection is for, let us get a bit of head room to sustain competitiveness. Plus that isn't much next to the figures that Nunes and Nkunku will go for.Good player, depth for all 3 attacking positions, and adds much needed pressing & shithousery to our attack. But nearly 60 million seems a lot. I mean it makes total sense since he's Everton's best player and vital to them, but not sure it's the best move for a club of our resources to spend a big chunk of our budget on a rotational option.
That's what the equity injection is for, let us get a bit of head room to sustain competitiveness. Plus that isn't much next to the figures that Nunes and Nkunku will go for.
What should we be spending it on then? What do we do if Sonny is out? That nullifies everyone else...EVERYONE else. And what do we do if Harry is out? And PL backlines will dread him in our lineup moreso than anyone besides Sonny because his athleticism is threat.Good player, depth for all 3 attacking positions, and adds much needed pressing & shithousery to our attack. But nearly 60 million seems a lot. I mean it makes total sense since he's Everton's best player and vital to them, but not sure it's the best move for a club of our resources to spend a big chunk of our budget on a rotational option.
He’s a diving cuntI watch Richardson twice a year. Can anyone explain what sort of player he is?
Correct. It’s a free transfer until he starts 10 PL gamesDele I thought had an escalation on the fee subject to number of performances , a criteria he seems unlikely to meet
and that annoying chicken celebration
He is a fucking bitch with the constant diving, but also the kind of player you never have worry about turning into another Ndombele. The kid works his bollocks off.Sounds like he would be a great signing
36 caps for Brazil - 14 goals. Quite tasty.
I think Richarlison offers you more at RW/LW than either Isak or Lautaro.. but Lautaro in particular is much better through the middle if Kane happened to be out for any period of time.51m GBP sounds about right for a proven Premier League striker.
I think any of DCL, Watson, Richarlison types go for 50m+ and Richarlison is probably the best striker not playing at top 4 (plus United) clubs.
Also Winks going the other way will shave a good chunk off that.
I wouldn't be against this.
Shithouse cunt but is a nuisance for defenders, has good personality for big games and can be flexible across the front three. And prem proven of course.
Is someone like Martinez or Isak better for 30m more and no experience in England?
Yeah so if he’s unlikely to meet that criteria, can’t they take the value Dele’s worth off the price off Richarlison?
What should we be spending it on then? What do we do if Sonny is out? That nullifies everyone else...EVERYONE else. And what do we do if Harry is out? And PL backlines will dread him in our lineup moreso than anyone besides Sonny because his athleticism is threat.
This seems a spectacular utilization of our limited resources because it's clearly to utilize some of our dead wood to get a better deal where we'd have no other options but to pay up elsewhere.