• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer 2022 Transfer Thread.

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Someone fractured a bone in his foot during a training match tackle you fucking relentlessly ignorant dunderhead.

It has nothing to do with his muscle mass. He's not even that bulky.

Oliver-Skipp-Oct-2021.jpeg
Agree, he’ll be back after Forest 🌳

Everyone chill on Skipp
 
Just read on 90 mins article zianolo saying mourinho is blocking his desire to join us. Pretty little grudge jose playing by sounds of it cos he got fired turning our team playing prehistoric football...like parking the bus away to crystal palace. Thank fuck hes gone.
What utter nonsense. Or maybe he's just keeping Zaniolo because he's a good player and Roma don't need the money as badly as the other sides?
 
But we're here now. And it was worth the fucking wait.
assuming that Tottenham’s history can be deleted and we start from year zero & ENIC’s arrival, I will accept that.

But we didn’t and we have quite a lot of history before ENIC where we will find a significantly more successful football club than what we currently have. I am pleased with where we are now. But look where the current owners had us just 12 months ago.
 
You missed out the vital fact that when ENIC bought in to Spurs, 5th best was sadly in history

Reality is we had finished in about 15th position in league for many years.

Martin Jol got Spurs into 5th position in PL (highest position for 20 odd years).

The rebuild started from almost bottom of Pl - and we struggled to compete with the likes of Aston Villa, Newcastle or many similar teams we now tower over
This is not true. The average league position in the 10 year period pre ENIC was 9 (actually works out to 9.5 so could also argue 10th & I’d accept that)

1992 and 1994 we did finish 15th.

In three out of the first 7 years under ENIC the team managed to finish 10th / 14th and 11th. In that time they also finished 5th twice and no higher than 9th in the remaining 5 seasons.

This is not to rubbish ENIC’s achievements, of which there are many. Indeed the club has not been lower than 8th now in 12 years a fantastic achievement in itself. But facts are facts.
 
Last edited:
Although Im not entirely on board with my portly friend's colourful language, he does have a point. It's not "our" sport, it's just sport. Regardless of its origins, to try and claim ownership and dictate the terminology required is a nonsense

Who are you calling portly, streaky bacon?

:wansum:
 
Apparently this is fake news and clickbait.
Actual quote:

We are talking about a good squad," Conte said. "I always say to you that I think we have just started our process to try to build a strong squad.

"This is normal because after only eight months, I think we did a really good job with the club together to improve the players that I started to play with. In January, to bring two players like Deki [Dejan Kulusevski] and Rodrigo [Bentancur].

"And now in the last transfer market to bring other players to improve ourselves. We have to continue in this way but I know very well that I can't have everything quickly because it would be foolish to ask for a lot of players and to spend a lot of money.

"I think that we are doing the right things with common sense, not to spend an amount of money for many players, also because this is not the politics of the club. I understand this. You have to go in the right way, doing the right things and I think we are doing this."
Seems like everyone is on the same page and happy with what’s happening.

Conte says it would be foolish to:
- ask for new players and
- spend a lot of money

He’s speaking in a second language though so who knows how he would put it in Italian.
 
This is not not true. The average league position in the 10 year period pre ENIC was 9 (actually works out to 9.5 so could also argue 10th & I’d accept that)

1992 and 1994 we did finish 15th.

In three out of the first 7 years under ENIC the team managed to finish 10th / 14th and 11th. In that time they also finished 5th twice and no higher than 9th in the remaining 5 seasons.

This is not to rubbish ENIC’s achievements, of which there are many. Indeed the club has not been lower than 8th now in 12 years a fantastic achievement in itself. But facts are facts.

Our last decent season before enic took control was 1989/90 when we finished 3rd.

After that we had about 3 seasons when we finished 7th or 8 th but for the most part we were in the bottom half of the table until Jol got us 5th place in 2 successive seasons in 2005/6 and 2006/7.

So my point was enic bought when we were far from our peak - even though our history said we were a 'big club' and part of the one time 'Big 5' Clubs (surprisingly then including Everton).

Since then its not been a straightforward ride although we have been in european competitions with the exception of one season since 2006 - no small feat given the english clubs we need to compete against, and we've done better on that score than all but about 2 other clubs.

Not enic's fault but the stadium took at least 10 years from first serious application to being built as Haringey council was not initially keen. And enic was always clear they wanted to have the club self sufficient which meant moving from, WHL to a stadium which could deliver those kind of revenues, only to be delayed again by a couple of years by covid.

In 2001 had you asked Levy at the point enic took a controlling stake in Spurs how long it would be before a new stadium would be built, I suspect he'd have said 'not more than 10 years with luck'.

So its certainly true its taken longer to get to out current state, than anybody thought likely which is obviously frustrating. On the other hand one of our Big 5 rivals, Everton, have a long difficult road to get back to being a top 6 club, and other 'old' rivals such as Villa are not much better.

And some our managerial choices haven't been great (Ramos for example) - but that's true of other clubs as well and ManU post Ferguson have had a worse run of managers than us despite their money, Woolwich post Wenger are struggling.

So overall I'm inclined to view enic, warts and all, as having been reasonably successful at rebuilding Spurs.

And with Spurs now broadly self sufficient for the future and propped up by a £150m capital injection at the present I think we can look forward to the future with a degree of optimism - even though the opposition of petrodollar Man City, Liverpool, Chelsea still benefitting from Russian money, ManU's still big revenue streams won't make things easy.
 
Last edited:
I was disappointed we made GLC's loan permanent off the back of about 3 good games.
The fact we're now struggling to get rid should teach us a lesson with these deals and make sure we're never obliged to buy unless they prove to be consistently brilliant with quantifiable proof. Like Kulu for example.
Wasn’t the GLC’s loan the first signing to follow a loan with an obligation to buy. Wasn’t it to avoid a sell-on clause or some sort of payment deferral?
 
Back
Top