That bloody lack of creative midfielder ey!?
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Kulu isn't that good in the middle, at least not in the sense you intend. He played as a "mezzala" (box to box lateral midfielder) in Parma but he was good there because he had wide open spaces to run into with the ball on one of the flanks. He is made to run with the ball, it's his main quality, and you usually can't do that much in the very middle of the pitch.Unless someone like Kulusevski could be conditioned to play the third spare midfielder (which I did suggest earlier I think)
I guess this is what I pictured when making the suggestion. I don’t actually think I see him playing through balls, but his ability to drive forward with the ball, his first touch, and the fact that he’s very good at one touch football/ give and go make me feel there’s potential there.He could work as a mezzala (the role he had in Parma) so one of the two lateral players in the 3-men midfield, but he wouldn't have a "creative passer" role as much as a "driving force" role.
In fairness the context of the comments you disapprove of make those comments very different to how you’re portraying them:It always amazes me how we have a player that's playing well in a certain position.
People then come on and say "okay him at WB", or "Try him in the middle".
Fuck that, leave him where he's playing well and get the other players to improve rather than risking him playing poorly in a new position.
I think we might start three CM’s vs Goons in a 3523-5-2 will only be used if we are winning and need to regain control of the middle of the pitch. Last 15/20.
We’ll do it in NLD too if we are winning going into final quarter.
It wasn't a pop at anyone in particular and wasn't really aimed at Kulu either tbh.In fairness the context of the comments you disapprove of make those comments very different to how you’re portraying them:
I don’t think we could play a 3 that would work if it came from our current collection of CMs, so IF we did that I would rather try Kulusevski there (especially given that there’d only be 2 forward slots if we changed a CM3) than use 3 primarily defensive players.Is very different to
‘He’s playing well where he is but I want to try him in a new role’.
Didn’t say I want him there, merely supposed that if we played a 352 instead of 343, instead of dropping him (assuming you wouldn’t want to change his position to centre forward), I’d try him as a spare midfielder in 3 instead of going with 3 safety first players.
Kulu isn't that good in the middle, at least not in the sense you intend. He played as a "mezzala" (box to box lateral midfielder) in Parma but he was good there because he had wide open spaces to run into with the ball on one of the flanks. He is made to run with the ball, it's his main quality, and you usually can't do that much in the very middle of the pitch.
Don't give Conte ideasIt's the equivalent of saying to play Dier at CF just because he's scored a couple of goals.
To be fair, it worked for Malcolm McDonald.
Fantastic post match presser. He wants to change us from being a club where good players go to have a guaranteed start, to a club where good players come off the bench. We have been sorely lacking in this department for years against our top 4 counterparts.
Love him.