I'm misunderstanding - Do you mean they can't be found not guilty?
Or do you think they're innocent?
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
I'm misunderstanding - Do you mean they can't be found not guilty?
Yeah, regarding cooking books vs the parent Co loan, in hindsight, seems odd.I honestly don't see how they can't be found guilty. They have never once denied any of the emails of theirs that blatantly show them cooking up the commercial activities (and these are just the original Der Spiegel piece, there are scores of other stuff they have been accused of by the PL), their defence thus far has been to say "the emails were obtained illegally".
If the PL want to sell a fantastic product and therefore continue to sell worldwide and continue to grow the money they take then City would actually be a threat to that. City are just too dominant, this makes for a shit contest (to have the same team win every single year, it's not competitive, yet it's sold as competitive). It's honestly in their interest to penalise the fuck out of them. Demote them, take away their titles, fine them and then distribute that money to the rest of the league.
But there just isn't anything that predates this where clubs have ever been appropriately penalised for their crimes. Arguably the ban on English clubs following Heysel Stadium was appropriate, those fans from the other Clubs other than Liverpool would argue otherwise with some justification, but the penalty was severe and completely appropriate when taking into account that nearly 50 people were killed. And was the begging of getting hooliganism out of football (another debate entirely but the way this was actually done was largely wrong IMO).
But yeah, I've zero confidence that they will end up with a big fine but one that still shows that it was worth every penny because they still benefited from doing it.
One fundamental thing that I don't understand is why would they bother to cook the books the way they did. Why not just do what Abramovich did and just pump their money in under a loan?
Guilty on all the stuff they were charged of by UEFA 100%, the emails prove without doubt. As for the newer stuff they are being charged with by the PL some of it looks like they are chucking as much shit as they can and hope something sticks.I'm misunderstanding - Do you mean they can't be found not guilty?
Or do you think they're innocent?
A sky bar you say! A roof walk experience you say! Over 60k expansion you say! A Hotel you say!???
Where do they get these ideas from? Hhhmmm
They also copied us by putting in a Tunnel Club too!
The big problem here is, filling it. They have problems doing it now and those that are there are there because they won the employee of the month competition at their work.
A sky bar you say! A roof walk experience you say! Over 60k expansion you say! A Hotel you say!???
Where do they get these ideas from? Hhhmmm
They also copied us by putting in a Tunnel Club too!
The big problem here is, filling it. They have problems doing it now and those that are there are there because they won the employee of the month competition at their work.
The for Chelsea loans helped cash flow not ffp only income from football related income can be used for ffp (hence city cooking the books to increase sponsorship revenue). What that meant was Roman could lend the money within the rules to Chelsea and not break ffp, some of the money was pre ffp the rest would have come under money allowed to be injected by ownership.Yeah, regarding cooking books vs the parent Co loan, in hindsight, seems odd.
Equally though, I cannot fathom how something as obvious and easy to track as a parent company loan was ever able to get round FFP... It's soooo transparent it's almost like they just didnt think / thought nobody would be that brazen.. Muppets.
A sky bar you say! A roof walk experience you say! Over 60k expansion you say! A Hotel you say!???
Where do they get these ideas from? Hhhmmm
They also copied us by putting in a Tunnel Club too!
The big problem here is, filling it. They have problems doing it now and those that are there are there because they won the employee of the month competition at their work.
Although it's fair to say they have copied us on this too. We ditched ours and it was never built.Yeah, but where's their cheese room? Northern scruffs, not classy metropolitan types like what we is.
Although it's fair to say they have copied us on this too. We ditched ours and it was never built.
Obviously inspired by Levy...Proposals include a sky bar overlooking the pitch and a stadium roof walk experience.
That's it, I quit! 347 years of terrible football I can put up with, but cancelling the cheese room is the final straw*.
* I mean the nice twisty ones with Parmesan, from Waitrose, obvs.
Yep, things looked OK when we had Leicester on toast early season, but we soon learned that our manager didn't give Edam. I am glad we told him Gouda here.
A sky bar you say! A roof walk experience you say! Over 60k expansion you say! A Hotel you say!???
Where do they get these ideas from? Hhhmmm
They also copied us by putting in a Tunnel Club too!
The big problem here is, filling it. They have problems doing it now and those that are there are there because they won the employee of the month competition at their work.