• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer Transfer Thread 2023! - Closed (Maybe)

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Rate this window out of 10

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10


Results are only viewable after voting.
The model of spending on low unproven players with potential is only successful at clubs with the best possible scouting and analytics departments and a comfortable environment where players are given time to develop as there isn't any pressure to compete at the highest level season after season.

The transfer hit rate largely depends on the quality of your scouting and analytics team whether you're Man City or Brentford.

Absolutely, and that's what has significantly impacted us. I'm all for us going after some big name, big money signings because they are the ones who are/can be just that next step up from a really good to a great player. But I also think that we need to have a healthy balance between those players and the less proven, potentially high reward ones.

You were criticizing the Nkuoudou and N'Jie acquisitions, but some of those players just aren't going to hit but they are relatively a very low risk for the few gems you will find. So few players are going to be anything close to a guarantee star, so to your point that's where the analytics and scouting becomes so important. We've spent big money (and yes, we could have spent a lot more) but we've been terrible at both our bigger purchases and the smaller ones.

My whole point is that some less proven players at lower salaries isn't inherently a bad thing, and could actually be a better strategy for some clubs as long as you have a plan and logic behind it.
 
The model of spending on low unproven players with potential is only successful at clubs with the best possible scouting and analytics departments and a comfortable environment where players are given time to develop as there isn't any pressure to compete at the highest level season after season.
I don't see what a low pressure environment has to do with it, Real Madrid buys unproven players all the time, and it's the most high pressure, least comfortable environment in football.
 


I'm sure we'd be top of that list.
Dog Phone GIF
 
Bentancur’s dip in form at Juve came when they tried to shoe horn him in as a 6. Lost the ball in bad areas and his confidence dipped. Much better as an 8 for Ange.
Yup, even at Spurs he had that tendency. He's an elite dribbler for a CM but can often be casual and lack situational awareness leading to turnovers. He also doesn't have the best pass on him, choosing instead to dribble for too long.
 
The model of spending on low unproven players with potential is only successful at clubs with the best possible scouting and analytics departments and a comfortable environment where players are given time to develop as there isn't any pressure to compete at the highest level season after season.

The transfer hit rate largely depends on the quality of your scouting and analytics team whether you're Man City or Brentford.
I actually agreed with this. There may be hope for you, after all.
 
I didn't agree with your evaluation of Sanchez, but I do agree with your main point.

If his wages are greater than £4M per year, it's only common sense to get him off the books for whatever the amount is.

That doesn't mean we shouldn't put a £15M price tag on him though. It's not extortionate, we could always be negotiated down to somewhere in the middle, or stating £15M could even trigger other interested parties.

He wouldn't be the first player that other manager have looked at and thought "I can get a tune out of him," so they may even see £15M as a bargain.

When you have Championship players being touted at £30M, £15M for an established international suddenly looks like a bargain.

Regardless, if he's not in the manager's plans, and he no longer wants to stay here, then we need to take the best price we're offered, which isn't necessarily the first one.
Of course. However, give it a deadline and work to conclude it. If you can’t move the dial, pull the trigger at 9M and take the L.

You don’t want thir lot stinking out pre season - cull them asap
 
Tapsoba over VDV please. I can't trust a big CB who can't win aerial duels, especially in the PL.

Just get both, Levy you bald fraud.
 
Well yet again somebody insulting Levy with some completely unintelligent insult. Really boring.
He is a bald fraud tho. Have you heard the meek little dweeb speak? No wonder we’ve won f all in 1/4 century under them. About as inspirational as nothing. Literally a vacuous non entity, incapable of getting a club pulling in the same direction. Bald little gibbon

Worst part about the runt is the shit exec echo chamber of ill qualified, overpaid yes man. F off Cullen et al
 
Back
Top