LOL....
No-one expected him to be this much of a bust; but he was clearly a HG-quota signing and most thought it was a bad career move for him at the time.
(When Pepe signed Rodri he said something to the effect that "he'll be the best player in the world in his position"....... Pep signs Phillips and called him fat!!!!)
LOL.... The posts shuffle once more.
Who are all these players that Spurs signed who they expected to be nothing more than dead-end bench-riders anyway?
Richy is the only one that immediately sprang to mind in recent (Paratici) time and he cost 60m quid!!!
No.... Of course not. Da fuck you even doing at this point?????
I originally asked why the vast majority of other clubs don't have a 'Kane' sat on the bench? (Because of the twatty 'only Spurs don't do things like that' rhetoric that had already been claimed)
YOU implied a significant number do.
YOU mentioned budget being the reason.
YOU mentioned not signing mere squad players.
Evans is an example of a richer, more spendy club signing an over the hill player as squad player.
It's part of a successful rebuttal (much like most of the above that you've had no successful counter-argument to).
So many words, so little substance.
We need to get you an editor.
Boils down to the fact that we need to be signing x2 starting 11 quality players in most positions.
GK you sign a back up.