We've controlled 20 games from start to finish says a 'fan', to be fair at least you answered.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Manager Ange Postecoglou
- Thread starter The Fighting Cock
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
I read on here it was apparently smalltime to worry about what other clubs do, funny how it's ok when it comes to questioning this manager though ehYou ask a question about our manager and wondering why we're not controlling matches against teams in the league
I say that there's 17 other teams struggling to do the exact same thing as you ask for and apparently there's no relevance to your question whatsoever, you're hilarious.
Whatever crumbs of comfort you wanna hang onto though, whatever makes thing easier to digest for you better about your agenda.
Miss me with your bullshit bad faith arguments .
So we didn't deserve to win those games? Or is your idea of 'control' a cricket score?We've controlled 20 games from start to finish says a 'fan'.
You must be one of those 'fans' who clearly doesn't understand the sport they're watching to come out with a statement like that.
You've had your question answered, now answer mine. How many managers, in English top flight history, have won the league in their first season with virtually a brand new team, playing in a completely different way? I even gave you a hint.
My take is, regarding the whole curfuffle post-City game, is not of him learning, he's not changed his pov one bit (which, IMO, is great btw), but he is using this as a live example to communicate further on his beliefs. He's done this by taking full ownership and responsibility, he's not blamed anyone, in stark contrast to the two particular cunts in Mourinho and Conte. So if he thinks members of the staff are still to fully buy in the way he wants them to (his vision of what an elite football must be to be successful) then he saying he needs to be better at conveying his message.
He's apologised he got the sentiment wrong and the consequence of doing so means the preparations for the game were affected. I LOVE the fact though he doesn't accept (and never will) why anyone will be okay with your team dropping points.
Above all, I simply love his authenticity.
Lol nobody expects us to win the league. We are 19th in the form table and have given up an 18 point lead over Chelsea.
This is concerning. It shows a period of dreadful form and no progress. Fine for people to worry a bit and question if we can turn this around as lots of managers don’t turn form that bad around.
Exactly
It’s a lazy assumption that long term injuries playing again = problem solved
Didn’t stop the Angenda Karens from using it as the backbone of their case though
You're 100% right my friend, it is concerning. However, that has absolutely nothing to do with the question being asked, which was how many games did we control from start to finish.
Ignoring the fact that no team ever totally controls an entire game, from start to finish, throughout an entire season, my answer was spot on. Every game we've won has been because we were the better team with the vast majority of control over the game. We've even lost games (Villa and WH) where we had control of the game, but were let down by poor finishing and brief lapses, for which we got punished.
"So we didn't deserve to win those games? Or is your idea of 'control' a cricket score?"
Just so I understand you right, winning a game means you controlled it?
Couldn't care less mate (although our last manager would be one), I don't recall stating he should have won the league, I merely asked how many games people think we controlled and won convincingly.
You have at least answered however wrong it might be.
We seem to have a disconnect over what controlling a game and winning it convincingly means, thought it was pretty straightforward but apparently not.
What an absolute load of bollocks you melodramatic fucking drama queen.
Literally nobody on here bar a few Ausies gives a single shit about that pathetic friendly on the other side of the world next week.
If that's your argument why have you done the exact same thing here:
And here:
Bit weird that don't you think?
The more you reply with bullshit the more you dig yourself into a hole, just give it up man
Probably not many, as should be expected considering its his first season. Don't you think it's unfair to expect full controlled games this early in his tenure? 3 seasons in.. sure...
It actually also shows that we had a much kinder fixture list in the first half of the season.
The second half of the season we had all the following fixtures
United A
West Ham A
Chelsea A
Newcastle A
Liverpool A
Villa A
A red hot Woolwich at home
If that run of games (Newcastle, Woolwich, Liverpool, chels) had been spread out over the season and the results had been isolated rather than in one cluster, I don’t think there would have been the meltdown we saw. Even if we were 5th.
There were still some good performances second half of the season - I don’t think we played badly against Woolwich at home, city at home, Villa away for example.
So winning 20 games deservedly is not being in control?
I've never claimed winning a game means you have control. They key word here is deservedly. It means you had control of the game. It's that context thingy that you appear to have trouble understanding.
What a surprise you don't care. Can't answer a question, shrug it off.
No, it's not Conte, he didn't bring in a virtually new team to play in a completely different way. Nor was it Ancelotti. Christ, I'm even narrowing the field here for you.
You're having a mare here mate, put the shovel down. Even the resident rescue ranger has given you up as a lost cause.
WOW!!!!
Annual revenue comparible to Woolwich, Chelsea and even Liverpool........But a wage bill dwarfed by all three!!!!!
There really is an issue with the way this FOOTBALL club prioritises everything but the actual fookin' football team.
Normally though that kind of form over an extensive period means that managers have lost the players and they've given up, this team haven't given up (apart from the Chelsea match) tactically you can say that he set the team up to open and we were getting picked off and we had trouble defending set pieces which is all on the manager, happy to admit that.
But the City match told me there's still life in us and that he's able to stop the weakness and can do something about it anyway.
I'm pretty sure you or someone else mentioned Klopp and Arteta yet again hence mentioning them.If that's your argument why have you done the exact same thing here:
And here:
Bit weird that don't you think?
The more you reply with bullshit the more you dig yourself into a hole, just give it up man
"The fans are a major problem with this club, more so than the board IMO"
Just seen this, no point talking to you mate.
You really missed the point of my post didn't you. Capology is not a reliable source and anything post the 22/23 accounts is guesswork. The latest figures have our wage at 5th, ahead of Woolwich. It's true that we're dwarfed by Liverpool that's hardly shocking given their success on the pitch. Chelsea are about to be hit with the mother of all financial sanctions so I'm not sure theirs is a model we want to follow.
So all 20 games we've won have been deservedly, which according to your own words means we had control of the game, but winning a game doesn't mean you controlled it, am I reading that right?
Talk about a mare.
thats going to be interesting to watch hahaha.
What?
What do you even think you've done here?
Translated for you by the way
