I won't disagree with you here. On the balance of the game v Everton, you're probably right.
I think where our 8 draws are concerned, you could probably call them 50/50, with 4 of them where we didn't have control of the match, but the other 4 we did. Context comes into play there as well, where you have to consider who we played and where, i.e. 2 of them were away to City and the filth.
The last 10 games have taken the shine off the first season gloss, you'd have to be mental to think otherwise, but there's context there as well, for some of them. Regardless, as Deuterz has already said, there's obvious cause for concern simply because it HAS happened, whatever the context may be.
But if you're evaluating our performance across the season, there's also cause for optimism, if you're prepared to view it in a balanced way. Have we got all the moving parts required? No we don't, we're quite a bit away from that. Have we embedded the style and ethos into what we currently have? No. AP has said this himself as well. Should we expect better next season? Absofuckinglutely, else what is the point?
As with everything else, there should be balance when evaluating everything we've experienced over the course of this season, and there's far too much context to take into consideration to make arbitrary claims on whether this season has shown us if he's the right man for the job or not.
