Per wikipedia
A
straw man fallacy (sometimes written as
strawman) is the
informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction. One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man".
You're discrediting my criticism of Ange's tactical acumen by attacking the fact that I haven't posted said criticism after games we've won. This is an entirely different argument than the one under discussion, designed to obfuscate from the point of said original argument, thus satisfying the terms of a strawman fallacy.
but if you want to continue posting pseudo-intellectual bullshit to make yourself feel bigger, be my guest, it doesn't make you look any wiser or more insightful, just pompous and unwilling to actually engage in a meaningful discussion.