• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management So (hypothetically) who replaces Ange then?

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Who to replace Ange?

  • Andoni Iraola

  • Edin Terzic

  • Graham Potter

  • Thomas Frank

  • Marco Silva

  • Kieran McKenna

  • Ryan Mason (Full Time)

  • Michel

  • Xavi

  • Mauricio Pochettino

  • Dino Toppmoller

  • Simone Inzaghi

  • Sean Dyche (Click here if you're an idiot)

  • No-one (Ange new contract)

  • Oliver Glasner

  • Vincenzo Italiano

  • Vitor Pereira

  • Scott Parker

  • Will Still


Results are only viewable after voting.
Don't know how reliable, but wasn't there some story about Frank having a release clause of 8 million? Doesn't change much about your point, because we will still try and be negotiating that down. But 20m to break a managers contract doesn't feel like something Tottenham would ever touch.
You could be right bro. I'm only going off media reports and the number's I've read varies from 8m-20m. Brentford definitely entitled to something anyway. I'm guessing Spurs have everything agreed with Frank and didn't relaise they'd have to pay Brentford so much compensation. Now they are having second thoughts.
 
Also worth remembering that we hijacked Brentford for both Archie Gray and Brennan Johnson. Both were late hijacks too after Brentford had agreed all personal terms.

No love loss between the clubs. Brentford will want every penny they can get to release frank.
 

View: https://x.com/sb8308715342770/status/1929463187604414832?s=46&t=fbqxNuG9CT4qTaiJx8mBjg

Respect Frank the coach but every word here is spot on.

Frank will be painfully out of his depth at Spurs and in the CL.

And those doubts from the players will be in the back of their minds from the very start.

Just for the sake of of comparison: Ange across his entire managerial career has a winning percentage of 53% (783 games) compared to Frank at 45% (526 games). Now, Ange's win % at Spurs is 47% (101 games) versus Frank's win % of 42% (317 games which includes games at the Championship level whereas Ange stat does not). Utter madness if Levy goes for Frank.
Nicked from somewhere else.
From what I read... not a single team in the champions league managed to put out a full squad due to them not hitting the CT rules.

Most other clubs are ran at big losses.. thats why.
Saw this comment on the BBC from an Anonymous Utd fan:
Hi, I'm a Man Utd fan of 40+ years standing,.... and I so, so wish we had poached Thomas Frank from Brentford, sorry Bees fans, because he's an amazing manager, and would never let Alejo go.
 

View: https://x.com/sb8308715342770/status/1929463187604414832?s=46&t=fbqxNuG9CT4qTaiJx8mBjg

Respect Frank the coach but every word here is spot on.

Frank will be painfully out of his depth at Spurs and in the CL.

And those doubts from the players will be in the back of their minds from the very start.


Disagree , heres why...

  1. Toney Suspension : Brentford lost their best goal threat for 8 months and they couldnt replace him.
  2. Brentford with a small squad had 21 injuries, with 11 of them requiring surgeries. Of the injured, 3 were serious knee injuries, 2 foot, 3 had bad ankle injuries , 1 hamstring, 1 abductor and 1 other... meaning not many muscle but other serious injuries
Brentford regardless finished 16th.

And what more, Thomas Frank started using Mbuemo & Wissa upfront this season and started playing totally different way. He showed he can play through the lines instead of going direct to target man.

Spurs on other hand , for the 2 seasons of Ange
2023/24 : No Europe. 1430 man days lost to injuries. 22 individual injuries (most by any club).
2024/25 : 1300 man days lost to injuries.

Most injuries muscle...but then squad is one of the youngest in PL. How can one of the youngest squad also be one of the most unfit and injured. May be answer in Ange's past.

Here's Ange on Celtic injuries (quote from dec2021) : "No, it’s not possible. It’s a by-product of the team we want to be and it’s part of the process. I’ve been through it a number of times with teams I’ve taken over and the initial process is always difficult."

So on one hand you have Ange, who has repeated failures of sustaining consistency across multiple competition due to injuries that were made by his tactics.... Vs Another manager, who also had to go through injury crisis and player ban but not of his making...but the end product there was, he learned he cant rely on a set player or system and made the Brentford team better after the crisis

Also that post references of 'oh Frank could be another Potter'...but why not Frank could be another Howe or Kompany or Maresca or Arteta or Poch ?
 
Disagree , heres why...

  1. Toney Suspension : Brentford lost their best goal threat for 8 months and they couldnt replace him.
  2. Brentford with a small squad had 21 injuries, with 11 of them requiring surgeries. Of the injured, 3 were serious knee injuries, 2 foot, 3 had bad ankle injuries , 1 hamstring, 1 abductor and 1 other... meaning not many muscle but other serious injuries
Brentford regardless finished 16th.

And what more, Thomas Frank started using Mbuemo & Wissa upfront this season and started playing totally different way. He showed he can play through the lines instead of going direct to target man.

Spurs on other hand , for the 2 seasons of Ange
2023/24 : No Europe. 1430 man days lost to injuries. 22 individual injuries (most by any club).
2024/25 : 1300 man days lost to injuries.

Most injuries muscle...but then squad is one of the youngest in PL. How can one of the youngest squad also be one of the most unfit and injured. May be answer in Ange's past.

Here's Ange on Celtic injuries (quote from dec2021) : "No, it’s not possible. It’s a by-product of the team we want to be and it’s part of the process. I’ve been through it a number of times with teams I’ve taken over and the initial process is always difficult."

So on one hand you have Ange, who has repeated failures of sustaining consistency across multiple competition due to injuries that were made by his tactics.... Vs Another manager, who also had to go through injury crisis and player ban but not of his making...but the end product there was, he learned he cant rely on a set player or system and made the Brentford team better after the crisis

Also that post references of 'oh Frank could be another Potter'...but why not Frank could be another Howe or Kompany or Maresca or Arteta or Poch ?


You want to accept injuries and suspensions as an excuse or not?

Because Ange has plenty of those in both seasons, especially the one where he finished 5th
 
Maddison needs a 4-3-3. He's not athletic enough for any other system. This was proven at Leicester when rogers could never find a role for Maddison whenever he reverted to a 3-5-2 or 3-4-3 formation. Tielmans and N'didi were always first choice centre mids so Maddison would find himself competing with Barnes and Perez for the wide roles which he was not as effective in.

Maddison is an out and out 10 really. Can play the 8 role in a 3 man midfield too. He was able to play in the 3-5-2 formation when Iheanacho hit form and Rogers started two strikers for a period with Maddison having a free role in behind but once Barnes was back in the team, they found it very hard to find room for Maddison. Maddison would only play when Rogers did 4-3-3 bar that one period where Iheanacho hit fire for a 10 game spell.

I think we'll have same issue at Spurs. He can't play in a 2 man midfield and he is not athletic enough to play in a front 3. With Champions League and rotation he will still be used loads, but can imagine him not being part of Frank's strongest 11 and not part of any future plans.

In truth Maddison is a luxury player and not a player who suits pragmatic managers. Hence why Conte never wanted him. He is/was perfect under Ange where we always aimed to be on the front foot and always lined up with 3 in midfield and Maddison always being the most attacking.

The truth is Maddison is one of our most important players and pulled the strings in the midfield. He’s one of the few players we have that has class and technical ability.

We were a much better side with him in team.
 
If Paratici had it his way then Luis Enrique could have been the Spurs head-coach...



 
The truth is Maddison is one of our most important players and pulled the strings in the midfield. He’s one of the few players we have that has class and technical ability.

We were a much better side with him in team.
I agree but Frank is a pragmatic manager who will find it hard to have a role for Maddison.

His preferred formation has always been 3-4-3 and Maddison won't suit that.
 
I agree but Frank is a pragmatic manager who will find it hard to have a role for Maddison.

His preferred formation has always been 3-4-3 and Maddison won't suit that.

The thing I like about Frank is he isn't a system manager. He is adaptable and flexible depending on the opposition. He isn't wedded to a particular formation. Plus, when he lost Toney, he found a different way to play that was more possession-based and less direct. This adapability is important considering our chairman always leaves his manager short on quality.

He is more pragmatic than Ange, sure, but I don't see that as a negative.
 
The thing I like about Frank is he isn't a system manager. He is adaptable and flexible depending on the opposition. He isn't wedded to a particular formation. Plus, when he lost Toney, he found a different way to play that was more possession-based and less direct. This adapability is important considering our chairman always leaves his manager short on quality.

He is more pragmatic than Ange, sure, but I don't see that as a negative.

i think Brentford rank in the top 10 for most long balls per game, and least possession this season
 
I agree but Frank is a pragmatic manager who will find it hard to have a role for Maddison.

His preferred formation has always been 3-4-3 and Maddison won't suit that.
Frank resurrected Christian Eriksens career post heart attack. Hardly a powerhouse athlete in midfield by that time. If Frank can accomodate Eriksen and make him an intergral part of a side. I definitely think he can do it with Maddison.
 
You want to accept injuries and suspensions as an excuse or not?

Because Ange has plenty of those in both seasons, especially the one where he finished 5th

Its a excuse , if those injuries are not made by him in first place

Its not a excuse, if he is the source of the problem.

I quoted you direct Ange quote on the same issue, where he agrees that injuries are part of way he plays. There is anecdotal evidence as well, interms of number of sprints we do under Ange (no 1 in league, and by a distance).
Now, you can disagree to Ange and dont want to come down. Its up to you or its up to people who look at the evidence and make their own assessment.
 
Its a excuse , if those injuries are not made by him in first place

Its not a excuse, if he is the source of the problem.

I quoted you direct Ange quote on the same issue, where he agrees that injuries are part of way he plays. There is anecdotal evidence as well, interms of number of sprints we do under Ange (no 1 in league, and by a distance).
Now, you can disagree to Ange and dont want to come down. Its up to you or its up to people who look at the evidence and make their own assessment.

How do you know Frank didn’t cause his injuries?
 
Frank resurrected Christian Eriksens career post heart attack. Hardly a powerhouse athlete in midfield by that time. If Frank can accomodate Eriksen and make him an intergral part of a side. I definitely think he can do it with Maddison.

I think its more than that. Just by including Eriksen, he also revitalised the entire Bretford attack. With the added class, other players around him, started to perform better.
 
i think Brentford rank in the top 10 for most long balls per game, and least possession this season

Listened to TEI on the way to work.

Even in the championship Frank was very basic in his approach to possession and playing through set defenders in mid/low blocks.

Brentfords entire data and recruitment model is built around playing against teams that dominate the ball.

Assuming you can just plug Frank into Spurs where he will have the ball 80% of games is exactly the kind of reactionary mindless flip flop this club has done in the Levy era.
 
Last edited:
How do you know Frank didn’t cause his injuries?

Err.... I stated the nature of injuries...
May be some more details...

Mbuemo , Pinnock, Janelt- ankle injuries
Rico Henry - ACL
Igor Thiago, - menniscus
Da Silva - knee
Schade, Jensen- adductor
Hickey - torn hamstring

One may be two had muscles injuries...
Otherwise, rest of them, did not suffer the kind of injuries Ange team suffers....

Unless you have proof that , Frank took a hammer and took out the knees of Henry, Thiago , Da Silva and he made scissor tackles on Mbuemo , Pinnock, Janelt.... he did not cause these injuries :)
 

can't read it- paywall

regardless doesnt discount what i said, Brentford 15th this season for possession
(Premier League: Most Possession)

Brentford 4th for long balls this season
(Premier League Club Stats - Long Balls)
 
Back
Top