• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Thomas Frank

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Are you Frank Out or In?


  • Total voters
    623
That's just irrelevant trolling. I have never criticised Johnson, or the goal, or his part in it.

The point you've interrupted with is using the EL as a rebuttal of the previous manager accomplishing attacking output from players. It's Wurzel Gummage levels of straw man.
You did... you said he shinned it... and Shaw actually scored which is wrong
 
You did... you said he shinned it... and Shaw actually scored which is wrong

That sounds like the actual opposite of anything I've said.
The search suggests in nearly 15,000 posts on here I've never once used the word 'shinned'

this is the only post I made, which is the opposite of what you're saying

Slightest of touches from Johnson but wasn't an OG - it is his movement that caused shaw to flap, though - if Johnson isn't there, the ball doesn't go in - regardless of how much credit anyone might want to take away from him for the goal.
 
It's too nuanced and would be taken out of context given a binary answer.

Put simply, I think Frank is experiencing the exact same issues every other big club has had with Muani, Simons, and Tel.
He's doing better (for output) than any manager has ever done with Richarlison.
Kudus has more assists per game for Spurs than he's had for any club before in his career.

So it leans towards a 'Yes', if we are basing on statistics and evidence, instead of pure unsubstantiated opinion.


It's like me asking for a simple yes/no for "You think Frank would be doing no better if Maddison, Kulusevski, and Solanke had been fully fit all season?"

It's not nuanced, and almost all opinion is unsubstantiated.

And to be blunt, I don't think he'd be doing better. If he was, wouldn't be by much. Because the intent in how he sets the team up just wouldn't be different enough. Madison no one to pass to, Solanke no one to play off, Kulu same as Kudus - isolated
 
I wanted Frank because I thought he was a student of the game?
Knew what was needed against various sides and therefore select the players best to achieve it.

But the big question mark that has been raised for me is does he have the belief and desire from the players to have the same belief ?

Is he asking to much of them or asking things in what they don't believe in, i.e the style, philosophy of the game.

There seems to be too much of an "overthink", puzzle pieces all need to be in the right place before you progress slowing our game down Instead of relying on instinctive play when there's space in front of you, which then fucks up the pre-match jigsaw layed out before hand.

My long -winded point is of course have a game plan but just as a blue print which can be altered when the opportunity provides it self.

Mix laptop football with instinct!
 
Last edited:
I wanted Frank because I thought he was a student of the game?
Knew what was needed against various sides and therefore select the players best to achieve it.

But the big question mark that has been raised for me is does he have the belief and desire from the players to have the same belief ?

Is he asking to much

I think it's a similar problem to Conte, to an extent - we're lacking players who are intelligent enough to do what is being asked of them. What will be interesting is if we bring in anyone in the window and something clicks.

What won't be popular, but necessary, will be moving on players that people like but are too thick to play under instruction
 
I think it's a similar problem to Conte, to an extent - we're lacking players who are intelligent enough to do what is being asked of them. What will be interesting is if we bring in anyone in the window and something clicks.

What won't be popular, but necessary, will be moving on players that people like but are too thick to play under instruction
Error on my part 🙏. Clicked post before completed. There's a couple more paragraphs should you care to read them in my second post.
 
Error on my part 🙏. Clicked post before completed. There's a couple more paragraphs should you care to read them in my second post.
What I have seen so far reminds me of AVB, where we get possession and the players look brain dead and start aimlessly passing it backwards and sidewards.

Whilst that is a 'current' issue, I think we're going through a necessary phase of having to evolve the players to tactical football, which (as per Eric Dier's interview) they haven't had since Conte. Frank or no Frank this is more like the "painful rebuild" people used to talk about that Poch wanted
 
I think it's a similar problem to Conte, to an extent - we're lacking players who are intelligent enough to do what is being asked of them. What will be interesting is if we bring in anyone in the window and something clicks.

What won't be popular, but necessary, will be moving on players that people like but are too thick to play under instruction

Nuno did well with Wolves and shit at Spurs, Conte added like two players Bentancur and Kulusevski and the team went on a good run of form.

Same players for the most part, so the same intellect, or were Kulusevski and Bentancur signed from Mensa?
 
I think it's a similar problem to Conte, to an extent - we're lacking players who are intelligent enough to do what is being asked of them. What will be interesting is if we bring in anyone in the window and something clicks.

What won't be popular, but necessary, will be moving on players that people like but are too thick to play under instruction
Some analysis this.

Took the, more or less, same group of players just weeks to implement Anges style of play? And whatever the view is on Anges style of play, it was very clear to see what our brand of football was, and it clicked almost from the go.

If Franks plan is not absorbable this long into his tenure, it may be that the plan is not the right one? Not the first manager to overthink the game, if that is the case.

Anyeay starting to lose patience with Frank, as I have a hard time seeing what his direction is. Players look disorganized, frustrated and worse, not invested.
 
And crucially, the managers ideas on how to improve the squad aren’t good enough either.

He’s obsessed with duels when our massive weaknesses is technical ability and passing.

We have to be done with buying players specifically for managers.

We're Tottenham. Everyone knows how we want to play. The recruiting team needs to find those players. If a manager doesn't like what he's working with, then Spurs aren't for him.
 
We have to be done with buying players specifically for managers.

We're Tottenham. Everyone knows how we want to play. The recruiting team needs to find those players. If a manager doesn't like what he's working with, then Spurs aren't for him.
Do we know that though?

We are talking of a club who over the last decade have hired managers from Nuno and Mourinho, to Anges gung ho..

If there is a Tottenham way of play the club managment itself need to define and implement that first, from top to bottom, incl for youth teams
 
Do we know that though?

We are talking of a club who over the last decade have hired managers from Nuno and Mourinho, to Anges gung ho..

If there is a Tottenham way of play the club managment itself need to define and implement that first, from top to bottom, incl for youth teams
This bullshit started with the stupid assumption that we needed to go fully over to the dark side, i.e. getting rid of Poch for Jose.

It’s been downhill ever since.
 
Spurs Current Top XI (not long-term injured players):
*no solanke, maddison, kulu...

Vic
Djed-Rom-VdV-Udog
Palh
Berg------Gray
Kudus------------Richy
RKM​
 
" You play at least, at least 10 shit games and can you win three or four of them 1-0 on a rainy day?"

He keeps saying the quiet part out loud. I don't think any top manager should allows their players to accept that playing bad and losing some games is natural. Sure, it is inevitable that even the best teams will play shit and lose some games every season but that's not something the manager should be openly verbalising or accepting.

Can't imagine Fergie, Klopp, Jose (or even Ange) ever using this type of language. That kinda talk feels a bit too mid-table/Brentford for my liking. It's too accepting of mediocrity.
 
Frank sure has got some serious eyebrows! Not sure I prefer to see him this close up.
giphy.gif
 
Back
Top