The difference is Arteta's team at their worse while they did go on bad runs certainly had an identity. Games they lost would typically see them create decent attacks and have something about them. You could see they would get better.For the folk that are saying he's probably going to get a few seasons as the board intend to copy the Arteta blue print.
The problem with this is that Frank's philosophy is all negative.
At first I thought he was just fixing the defensive shambles left behind by Ange. And that to me seemed very sensible nearer the start of the season.
But it's very clear now this is his vision of how we're to play.
So we're going to get better at what exactly if we're to keep Frank long-tern?
His whole mindset, the very premise of his philosophy is about stopping the opposition and negating them.
Rather than how we can affect the opposition and control games on the front foot.
And at home, against the majority of the league, that's what we should be setting out to do.
So what's going to change, is Frank suddenly out of the blue going to do this?
He's not the right fit for this Club at all. It looked odd at the time when we went for him, and it's been an utter disappointment.
It's remiss of the board to not sack him now (notwithstanding the heavy compensation)
Frank has shown nothing and we are just as bad as we have been since the end of 2023.