I think it's impossible to know from the outside how rotten the culture had become inside. Clearly you don't finish 17th twice with the squad we have unless something has gone horribly wrong.Wrote this in the other thread, for a 2nd choice LB it’s fine.. it’s obviously not some awful player and he’ll probably do a reasonable job in a bit-part role.
What concerns me much more about this is what it signifies about control behind the scenes — Robertson was a Lange/Vinai target predating De Zerbi. So Lange is still in charge then, at least for now… and it matches Vinai’s bollocks interview talking about needing proven leadership. So we’ve made a club signing and given a way past his best Robertson a fat chunk of wages, and I guess that’s that. I’d much prefer to pay for real quality, I think quality is by far a more pressing concern than “leadership” or “experience” but that’s just me… the whole thing is not entirely convincing and I still get the feeling that the overall direction of the club is in serious disarray.
Frank was a wet wipe but was clearly undermined by the players from early on.
Clearly the ownership thinks we need professional, experienced battlers rather than kids and foreign mercenaries.
That's why we've signed Palhinha, Gallagher and now Robertson. De Zerbi seems aligned with this.
I don't think it's a bad place to start. It should raise the floor.
We then need to sprinkle the stardust on top.
Aside from the leadership angle I doubt we could have signed a better LB rotation without blowing a large chunk of our transfer budget. I prefer the money to go towards fixing the attack.