Lets see...This is you to me in the past 24 hours:
Whatever, guy. This forum is now littered with your elicited attacks on my posts, even as of this morning. The trend is what you've established. Your childishness with the accumulating Kaboul heads doesn't help your case out either.
Exactly, in a whole thread full of views from others making opinions you've adamantly expressed disagreement with. And you targeted my post with one comment from the article despite my prefacing with "almost entirely." Whether you believe it or not is entirely fine, but it's yet another chapter in the recent series of you hunting my posts and attempting to discredit me specifically. For the sake of this forum, please stop.
Which yet further serves my point since you've removed all context. Thanks mate.
Come now, let's not try your typical twisting. Move on.
Ah, nit-picking now in your desperation.
Gibbs, we've been over this a merciless amount of times and every time you flaunt your inability in reading comprehension. If you want to chalk that to up to being pretentious, then so be it. But I'm weary of having to repeat myself because you cannot or refuse to appropriately read points made to you.
And yes, I have never seen you once discuss cause and effect in tangible terms, so I do believe you lack understanding in many complexities of this game. This is more than sufficient evidence to it:
Your abstracted connections made by failure to connect obvious dots are always amusing. But nonetheless, evidence that you're hopeless to discuss these things with.
Well this sums things up quite nicely per my issues with Gibbs, as I've nicely mentioned these same points almost exactly paraphrased to him in the past (albeit pre-Poch to use a specific coach as an example) and he's argued with it while giving you a "like."What an interesting bloke, indeed.
You know good n well it's not your information I take issue with here, it was your manner of response and delivery.
Even if that is what he actually believed verbatim, you've had far more ridiculous and "obtuse" ideas on here be treated with far more decency and respect in the responses than you afforded CJ with this one. Your behavior on this discussion is inexcusable, and no one will take it seriously if your point is delivered in such a manner. If you continue to argue this, you will only be digging yourself a deeper hole, so I suggest you drop it and discuss the real topic at hand in an appropriate manner.
Your desperation is showing Gibbsy ol boy. How about you mature a bit and move on?
This is absolutely incorrect, and it's easily identified as such by anyone who's sufficiently read through this thread, so I shan't merit it the response you were hoping to galvanize.
I'm curious Gibbs, are you a fan of American football and/or rugby? I think those may a bit more suitable to your tastes and understanding of sport.
Gibbs, there is absolutely no excuse for the manner in which you responded to a post simply pointing out rules and numbers, nor in the manner in which you've continued this debate. Abhorrent behavior for a discussion, and that's even by your own standards.
NEVER RED
