http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...-line-technology-unveiled-Premier-League.html
There is no "single frame" decision
What was point in getting this tit along to ask his opinion??
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
What was point in getting this tit along to ask his opinion??
You could see quite clearly that we were a lot more disciplined defensively, quicker to more into defensive positions, and dropping deeper than usual. You could see Lamela sticking to right midfield defensively, Eriksen to the left, and Chadli staying higher up as a secondary striker with defensive duties on their DM (Arteta/Flamini). When we won the ball we were much more direct than usual, trying to counter.
It was a clear game plan, and it almost worked out. A bit dissapointing that we got too deep and defensive towards the end, but the match as a whole should be a confidence booster for our lads.
Thank god for goal line technology. That dickhead ref would have given them a goal without it I reckon
and probably sent Lloris off for putting the game into disrepute
What's funny is those gooner melts who think that the graphic displayed on the TV screen is what HawkEye is using to make the decision, and then countering the Hawk Eye decision with a grainy picture which isn't even on the goal line.
They're so desperate. It's like their brains cannot compute that we might have equalled them on Saturday.
And lastly, remember - last time it was 1:1 at their place, we followed up with a peachy 5:1 at the Lane.
They're so desperate. It's like their brains cannot compute that we might have equalled them on Saturday.
And lastly, remember - last time it was 1:1 at their place, we followed up with a peachy 5:1 at the Lane.
It may have LOOKED like it went over... but then again, Pedro Mendes' goal LOOKED like it went over, and that wasn't given either... oh, no hang on, that DID go over didn't it!
Fuck 'em and their "This only happens to ArseAnal" conspiracies... NO IT DOESN'T... IT NEVER DOES!
However, if they want a few conspiracies, I'll give them some... let's start at Upton Park at the end of the 2005/06 season for starters... and then switch to Highbury for the main course!
CUNTS! fuck 'em all!
You only have to look at their previous league game to see how everything goes their way:
Lambert claimed his side were “running on empty” due to the virus that had swept through the dressing room.
Nathan Baker and Darren Bent were left out after falling victim.
Ashley Westwood fell ill before the game and was withdrawn at late notice and Andreas Weimann went off sick at half-time.
Lambert also revealed Fabian Delph and keeper Brad Guzan had been affected.
These are the luckiest cunts to have ever graced football
Of course it had a lot to do with Ade's performance, so many sides in the past have performed defensively with an adept CF who can provide an outlet to relieve the team of wave after wave of pressure. Didier Drogba was the master of this, disrupted momentum incredibly. The goal itself was down to one individual error, yet a better player than Ade would mean we wouldn't have been on the backfoot ever since we scored our goal.
If the screen is paused, then its a single frame isnt it......
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...-line-technology-unveiled-Premier-League.html
There is no "single frame" decision
I'd like to see the path the ball travelled on its way, because after the ball was shown to have not cross the line by the GDS, it most definitely got closer to crossing the line before Lloris clawed it away.
The decision system has shown the initial save, not the second movement by Lloris to clear the ball. I'd like to see how close that second instance was.
Miles away. Don't worry about it.
The decision isn't made by the single frame. although that is what we were shown.
If it uses Hawk-Eye technology, then it can assumedly display the course of the ball, like it does in tennis.
I'd like to see that added.
It was so far away that I think we should be questioning whether the ball wasn't over their goal line
For example Berbatov vs I think Bolton? When Keane got sent off. Berba was amazing.
It does use hawk eye! I gave you a link showing you it uses hawk eye too
you know what I'm going for a drink
Had a decent game yesterday, as did Rose for the most part as well. Fair play. Now can we see it consistently though.....??? ?!??
Extended highlights of our game against Woolwich are available for MySpurs members. Watch Chadli's goal and celebration to your heart's content -http://www.tottenhamhotspur.com/spurs-tv/highlights/
From the Spurs FB.
From the Spurs FB.
I think they should be grateful that Chadli and Lamela do not have electric pace because could you have imagined Bale playing on Saturday?? When we grabbed the ball back from them so many times he would've had an absolute field day running at their remaining back 2-3 and it could've been a comfortable, counter attacking victory.
I know it uses Hawk-Eye, I was stating that it should give you a plot of the ball like in tennis or cricket for example. As it is, you just get a single frame with no demonstration that this is the frame of interest, i.e the closest the ball came to crossing the line.