• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management Ange: In/Out?

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

In or out?

  • In

    Votes: 147 28.7%
  • Out

    Votes: 308 60.0%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 58 11.3%

  • Total voters
    513
I mean it's not even an entertaining watch any more, for our fans at least. Can't really enjoy all those breakaway goals when you know that any minute now the opposition will be waltzing towards our penalty area, then into it, through yawning empty space. And they're going to do it again and again and again, whether they're Chelsea or Bournemouth or fucking Ipswich.

The goals we let in are becoming increasingly painful to behold. It's beyond embarrassing and everyone's laughing at us. I'm unfortunate enough to know several Chelsea fans, and even at 2-0 down not one of them was remotely concerned they'd lose.

That Man City win looked fucking great on paper, and I celebrated it for days on end, but in truth City have (a) gone to shit, and (b) could/should have scored 3 in the first half alone.

Angeball might have proved unbeatable in the shit leagues he's previously managed in, but it was pretty much found out in the PL after 10 games and he's too stubborn to try and adapt. Maybe he simply lacks the coaching ability to do so.
 
I am starting to think there's something wrong with you.
Which one of those 2 had a loss ratio like this wally?
Are you seriously trying to claim they did no better than this clown?
I can't tell if you believe a lot of what you say or if it's all trolling/contrarianism.
Conte got Top 4 so he did better in the league. His second season was worse than this.
Jose got us to a cup final so Ange needs to do that but in the league and Europe he was worse.

Overall they weren't measurably different in any way. Generally half decent but not amazing squads, Drama, controversy and huge injury crises but bang average end results and fired.

Right now it looks like Ange ends up the same way but until it's over, there is still a chance he does better than them.
 
I mean it's not even an entertaining watch any more, for our fans at least. Can't really enjoy all those breakaway goals when you know that any minute now the opposition will be waltzing towards our penalty area, then into it, through yawning empty space. And they're going to do it again and again and again, whether they're Chelsea or Bournemouth or fucking Ipswich.

The goals we let in are becoming increasingly painful to behold. It's beyond embarrassing and everyone's laughing at us. I'm unfortunate enough to know several Chelsea fans, and even at 2-0 down not one of them was remotely concerned they'd lose.

That Man City win looked fucking great on paper, and I celebrated it for days on end, but in truth City have (a) gone to shit, and (b) could/should have scored 3 in the first half alone.

Angeball might have proved unbeatable in the shit leagues he's previously managed in, but it was pretty much found out in the PL after 10 games and he's too stubborn to try and adapt. Maybe he simply lacks the coaching ability to do so.
I called the City thing when we beat them in the League Cup - fuck, I even said before it that they wanted out as they were struggling. Some of the people here didn't believe Pep but he admitted it before they even drew us.
They are royally fuked and beating them proves nothing now.
Conte got Top 4 so he did better in the league. His second season was worse than this.
You're having a fucking laugh, right?
At this exact stage of that season we were 3rd in the league having lost 3 vs 7 games, those 3 being Arse, United and Newcastle.
In no way whatsever were we ever this bad under Conte up to and including the day he was sacked.
It's getting harder and harder to take you seriously when you talk that much shit. It has to be trolling. Has to be.
 
Or the end of AVB - getting thrashed on the regs and unable to score, an, get the ball over the halfway line.

People have short memories

People bitch and moan when things don't go well and things aren't going well. It's fine, it's why this forum exists. Just annoys me when the echo chamber gets so loud that any opinion counter to the bitching and moaning makes people think you are crazy.

End of the day, we are all bored of this same shit, all the time, under every manager.
 
Last edited:
I called the City thing when we beat them in the League Cup - fuck, I even said before it that they wanted out as they were struggling. Some of the people here didn't believe Pep but he admitted it before they even drew us.
They are royally fuked and beating them proves nothing now.

You're having a fucking laugh, right?
At this exact stage of that season we were 3rd in the league having lost 3 vs 7 games, those 3 being Arse, United and Newcastle.
In no way whatsever were we ever this bad under Conte up to and including the day he was sacked.
It's getting harder and harder to take you seriously when you talk that much shit. It has to be trolling. Has to be.

Nope, you either have the memory of a goldfish or an incredibly selective memory.
 
Messi came through Barca's academy, so did most of that squad.
Liverpool paid premium wages but that doesn't explain Salah's incredible injury record.
Darren Anderton and Ledley King are both widely regarded as Spurs legends who both played under ENIC's bonus straddled miser and the previous speculating miser.

It is arguably a fact that both of these players would have been sold had they not been injury prone / stricken.

Jam tomorrow is the dream but 4th place, on a lower budget, is the objective.

If Spurs fail in that objective who carrys the can?

The supporters are asked to 'invest' in their season tickets 15 months before they understand the outcome of that investment.

They pay more than any other supporters in the country.

The regime asking them to continually do this pay themselves a fortune and a bonus for pulling everyone's pants down year after year.
 
I voted ‘undecided’. But Im probably closer to accepting that he wont be a success at Spurs. Enic wont back him (or anyone else) sufficiently in the transfer market for Ange’s system to work. So we will likely yo-yo between good and terrible results.
Under Ange the ‘Lads it’s Tottenham’ reputation for folding when under pressure has never been greater. If we are 2 nil up against Southampton I bet their players will still believe they could come back.
For a clever man he makes some foolish comments eg we dont need to work on set pieces, could have made subs but it would only mask a bad performance, i will always win something in my 2nd season,
However I doubt we could get a very decent replacement manager midway through the season and so it’s probably best to stick with him.
I also still hold out hope that he could win the Europa which would be brilliant.
 
Spurs are different now in a critical respect. They reshaped their front office and brought in Scott Munn who has built a staff that is centered around the type football he was familiar with from his time in City Football Group. Whatever I think of Postecoglou and Munn's hiring (I didn't like either), you can't say Spurs don't have a direction that is clearly different than prior to their arrival. That's why Postecoglou being fired is very unlikely. If the Postecoglou hiring was a mistake, it is an early failure for Munn, who pushed Postecoglou to Levy, and a repudiation of the idea Spurs could emulate the City model on the pitch (but, on the cheap thanks to Postecoglou's innovative system). From a business standpoint, the rationale for Munn also involved the idea that teams could increase revenue by cultivating an international fan base. Firing Postecoglou wouldn't be an ordinary change, it would be an embarrassing failure of the new system. Not going to happen anytime soon.
 
I voted ‘undecided’. But Im probably closer to accepting that he wont be a success at Spurs. Enic wont back him (or anyone else) sufficiently in the transfer market for Ange’s system to work. So we will likely yo-yo between good and terrible results.
Under Ange the ‘Lads it’s Tottenham’ reputation for folding when under pressure has never been greater. If we are 2 nil up against Southampton I bet their players will still believe they could come back.
For a clever man he makes some foolish comments eg we dont need to work on set pieces, could have made subs but it would only mask a bad performance, i will always win something in my 2nd season,
However I doubt we could get a very decent replacement manager midway through the season and so it’s probably best to stick with him.
I also still hold out hope that he could win the Europa which would be brilliant.
Some coaches can "do well" without excessive backing.
Ange is not one of them. He would probably just cause more trouble even if we threw previously unseen amounts of money at him. At this stage, I don't want any more "ange players" unless they're on no obligation loans.
 
Spurs are different now in a critical respect. They reshaped their front office and brought in Scott Munn who has built a staff that is centered around the type football he was familiar with from his time in City Football Group. Whatever I think of Postecoglou and Munn's hiring (I didn't like either), you can't say Spurs don't have a direction that is clearly different than prior to their arrival. That's why Postecoglou being fired is very unlikely. If the Postecoglou hiring was a mistake, it is an early failure for Munn, who pushed Postecoglou to Levy, and a repudiation of the idea Spurs could emulate the City model on the pitch (but, on the cheap thanks to Postecoglou's innovative system). From a business standpoint, the rationale for Munn also involved the idea that teams could increase revenue by cultivating an international fan base. Firing Postecoglou wouldn't be an ordinary change, it would be an embarrassing failure of the new system. Not going to happen anytime soon.
If Munn won't fire Postecoglu then they both have to go.
 
I'm not sure how. They haven't been over played. They have been protected. They are either weak, or made of glass.

Romero has played

- ONCE in Europa league.
- Half a game in the EFL Cup.
- No more than once a week in the league.

Van De Ven

- Once in Europa
- 14 minutes in the EFL Cup
- No more than once a week in the league.

Richarlison - We knew he was done. He refused to leave in Summer.

Odobert - 160 minutes in the league and injured.
Perhaps its the system. Especially for VdV. he's expected to cover and sprint back a hell of lot. No wonder he suffers injuries. We are so open its nuts and Ange can't see it
 
This season:
Roma 2-2

Last season:
Everton 2-2
Brentford 3-2
Man C 3-3
Arse 2-2
Burnley 5-2
Brentford 2-2

+ a number of pre-season games.
Okay I forgot about Roma and pretty much every match you have listed is pre-Christmas last year. The Brentford one is marked by a short period of brilliance.
Tottenham 3-4 Chelsea
Tottenham 1-2 Ipswich
Galatasaray 3-2 Tottenham
Brighton 3-2 Tottenham
Newcastle 2-1 Tottenham
Tottenham 0-2 Man City
Liverpool 4-2 Tottenham
Chelsea 2-0 Tottenham
Newcastle 4-0 Tottenham
Fulham 3-0 Tottenham
 
I disagree. Conte was give Kulu, Bentencaur, Perisic, Udogie, Richarlison, Romero, Bissouma, Porro, Royal, Sarr, Lenglet. And of course the club did not sell Kane or Son.

If that's not being backed, I don't know what is!!

Conte's was hired to get Spurs a trophy; and hand over a working squad to the next coach. It was a temporary hire.

What killed it was

- death's to one of our coaches; and one of Conte's best friends back in Italy.
- Conte unwell and requiring surgery
- Many of our players with World cup commitments.

Basically, Conte was well backed, but didn't have the history, the heart and love for Tottenham and lost interest.
That’s a very very glass half full way of looking at it.

When you actually break down how Conte was “backed”…
- Kulu: okay good signing
- Bentancur: meh okay but nowhere near a top midfielder as much as we love to hype him.
- Perisic: free transfer and well past it
- Udogie: Conte never had him
- Richarlison: nowhere near good enough
- Romero: good signing but signed before Conte
- Bissouma: nowhere near good enough
- Porro: a last ditch appeasement effort signing that Conte had for a few weeks
- Royal: seriously? Also not a Conte signing
- Sarr: a young player for the future under Conte
- Lenglet: LOL
And of course don’t forget Djed ‘club signing’ Spence

So when you really look at it, ENICs efforts at “backing Conte” were absolutely no different to their “backing” of their other managers.

Cheap, lazy, unambitious, bare minimum crap.

If you bring in a manager like Conte, you don’t have a summer window where Bissouma, Richarlison and Lenglet on loan are the level of quality of your main signings.
 
I put Out... although there is some things I like. . we can get back in games when we fall behind and score a lot of goals in general.... issue is we fall behind a lot.

Other thing is when we are in front we have an ability to throw away leads...

Both stem from the same problem.

Take the two games against Brighton and Chelsea with better game management we win these. Postecoglous tactics/System got us in front it's also why we lost...if we won these and we would be 5th... He's the architect of his own downfall, carrying on leaving ourselves exposed against good footballing sides is just amateur.

Obviously it doesn't paper over other poor results but would stop us being so predictable if we just mixed it up a bit
absolutely. Its obvious if you play exactly the same way every match you give the opposition an advantage - Ange doen't seem to tweek anything either. Some of the defending has been calamitous and for me that's on the system - the back four (especially the centre backs and to a degree Sarr, Biss and Rodrigo) no wonder the errors are wracking up. Ange needs to realize this isn't the Scottish league.
 
Back
Top