I’m not, I’ve repeatedly said Arteta shouldn’t be used as benchmark, two different managers with two different situations. Yes there are similarities between them, yes a manager should be given time to implement his system and buy his players, but that has to come after you’ve rightly said the manager earned it.
Has Arteta earned the 2.5 years until he turned it around? By the looks of their progress after each of the first two seasons, probably not, but I’m not the one making decisions at Woolwich so they decided to stick with him for whatever reason. We don’t know the structure at Woolwich, we don’t know who is pulling the strings, what we do know is that he was backed in the transfer market and first and foremost, their scouting system found some really good players. Luckily for them, and yes I will say luckily because that’s what I think it was, luck, Arteta managed to improve Woolwich.
Now back on Postecoglou. Has he earned the right to oversee a rebuild? If you asked me this in 2023 I would say absolutely. Now I’m going to say no he hasn’t and I think everyone knows the reasons why. I don’t think people realize how low the bar was when Postecoglou joined, most of the fans wanted a top 6 finish (but didn’t care that much about it) and some good football. Has he delivered the former? Yes he has (so far, let’s hope we don’t fuck it up). But is the football good at the moment? No. Are the signs going forward encouraging? Based on what I’ve seen this year, no.
So you dont think Arteta deserved time but with the benefit it time he got better and got Woolwich to where they are now, yet you're not giving Ange the same luxury?
Ok I think we'll leave it there then...