I get a lot of the frustrations with Ange, and there are undoubted issues with some of his approach to tactical setup and substitutions.
But I do still quite like him and back him (I’d probably class myself as wanting to see more before making any rash decisions),The root of a lot of this was the summer though - I just don’t think we had a particularly strong transfer window and we’re really paying the price.
From what I’ve read some of that is on Ange and he’s backed himself too aggressively to polish up some diamonds and not realised the elite level of the PL IMO, but the club haven’t helped either.
For me this is particularly evident in the attacking areas (most of the GK and defensive signings have been decent).
None of Johnson, Solanke or Son (current version) are elite level players and it shows when you watch us play. Odebert is young and TBC, Moore is all potential and Werner isn’t of the required level.
If you compare our attacking options to the clubs in and around us we fall short. Our team would be sooo different with a Salah or a Saka in the side who is a consistent and constant threat to opposing full backs, but also offers a great outlet when under pressure.
I expect the inevitable retort of how many goals we’ve scored, but I don’t think that’s a particularly nuanced way of assessing what goes on in every game. Those attackers contribute to us turning over the ball and allowing dangerous counters time after time.
They also don’t pose enough of a threat to low block defences which we are seeing regularly setup against us.
The big myth is that Spurs have become a spending team over the last few years so board criticism isn’t fair. The reality is whilst transfer spend outlay has been refreshingly high, we’ve avoided anyone on chunky wages to prop up the books and that’s why we still have huge amounts of FFP margin and our wage to turnover ratio is so low.
A 65m player on 150k pw costs much less than a 45m player on 300k pw over a 5 year contract. Attacking signings like Johnson, Werner and Solanke haven’t really been game changers for us in any way.
If you look at this summers signings in particular, only Solanke has made any impact so far, and thus I did think 5th - 7th is where we’d be this season before we got started and that’s looking accurate.
As I said above, I think Ange has some culpability in that but as a club we were ineffective this summer and we’re paying the price currently.
I’m willing to cut Ange some slack because I don’t think our squad is particularly great……
That is very well put.
I agree with everything that is said here. I was critical of the window already during and right after the window.
But one thing that I would add or point out is that Ange knows what he needs for his system to work.
Why was he then content with only adding 20 yo Odobert to the mix?!? He was working with all the players in previous season. And he is only one who knows to what extent he is willing to change the tactical setup and gameplan (close to 0).
I mean with this crop of players, I am pretty sure that best way to play is 5-3-2.
As you pointed out - current way of playing expects that forward players should have good ball retention ability. Only Solanke qualifies for that. On top of that we have 2 players who are finishers but not so much creators in Son and Johnson. Most logical is to pair them up and have Solanke feeding balls to lethal finishers. Let fullbacks REALLY overlap and provide the wing-play.
Yet we keep playing to our players weaknesses not strong sides (0 change) and at the same time we did not make required moves in the market and according to Ange "were working to land Odobert from the start" or whatever.
I mean I am all for investing into youth. But it has to come with BALANCED approach for the players that can contribute now. We needed starting level winger so obviously and so badly...
He's legiimately in the middle of an injury crisis. Any manager ever would say the same. Blimey!