• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Ange Postecoglou

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Was sacking Ange a good idea?

  • Yes, I think it was a good idea.

    Votes: 73 64.6%
  • No, I think it was a bad idea.

    Votes: 40 35.4%

  • Total voters
    113
Ange will be here in January. If you think a midseason reboot is on the table, when our Club is still in contention for 3 cups and possibly a Europe spot, then you will be disappointed.
Unfortunately I think your right and ultimately we are both, along with thousands of others, are gonna just have to sit it out and wait and see what's in the trophy cabinet come May and if it's a carabo cup and a EL cup I'll enjoy that as much as anyone but I'd also need to see this school boy approach to league games change to because It I'm not a big basketball fan!
 
on what are you basing "manager can succeed" ?
we had almost full team against Palace & Ipswich leicester,
we had lots of the ball but failed to win, against City we had little of the ball so played counter football and scored 3 goals via quick breaks ( most of our goals come from quick breaks ie Conte style not ange ball lots of possession)
Okay, I'll give you an analogy.
Joe Schmidt. The Wallabies coach. A recognised top shelf coach. Record - Won 6 Lost 7 with Wallabies.
Do I want him to go? NO WAY. He's moulding them into a great team who should get over the Lions next year😊

I feel the same way with Ange.
He's brought in very young players who, together with the current academy talent and some loans, will have us rocking next year.
Come the end of the season, if we finish mid-table, and haven't won a cup or two....then I'll agree that he should go.
Until that time, I'll continue to back Spurs to succeed, win, draw or loss.

It's still going to be 5-2-2 over December.
 
Ange will be here in January. If you think a midseason reboot is on the table, when our Club is still in contention for 3 cups and possibly a Europe spot, then you will be disappointed.
Again with this certainty. He might well still be here in January or May but like any other manager he needs results. If for example we get 1 point from the next 4 league games and sit 14th at Christmas history tells us he'd be sacked. AVB was sacked 3 days before a league cup quarter having won every Europa game upto that point. Nuno was still in all the cups Our chairman sacked a manager 6 days before a final, another a week before a semi final.
 
Tell me you are new to Spurs without telling me 😅

Injuries happen, we didn’t strengthen the squad adequately enough before the season started when we knew we could play 69 games.

There is no way this chairman will sanction up to three starting quality players (which you could argue we need) in the next window. Maybe a couple of squad players.

The overall brand of football is better, yes. But this is a results business.
There is some precedent in decent January incomings to be fair - Deki and Bentancur both arrived in the same January.

That said it's absolutely not the norm and I wouldn't be expecting anything this time.
 
I've only been a Spurs supporter since Ange was appointed, before that I didn't support any team.
But now, I'll continue to support Spurs even if Ange is sacked.


I don't swap sides once I pick one.

I guess it all boils down to whether you are optimistic or pessimistic.
Personally, I think the brand of football Ange has instilled is great.
If we can get a few players back from injury, and maybe get 2 or 3 strategic signings in the winter window, I think Spurs can really go somewhere with this manager.

I'm still optimistic that the 9 December games will be 5W 2D & 2L

The old analogy... is the glass half full or half empty.

:davieshmm:

Shall I tell him or does someone else want to?!?! 😂
 
Okay, I'll give you an analogy.
Joe Schmidt. The Wallabies coach. A recognised top shelf coach. Record - Won 6 Lost 7 with Wallabies.
Do I want him to go? NO WAY. He's moulding them into a great team who should get over the Lions next year😊

I feel the same way with Ange.
He's brought in very young players who, together with the current academy talent and some loans, will have us rocking next year.
Come the end of the season, if we finish mid-table, and haven't won a cup or two....then I'll agree that he should go.
Until that time, I'll continue to back Spurs to succeed, win, draw or loss.

It's still going to be 5-2-2 over December.
We need to win our next 5 to keep our season alive, we drop another 6 points in the league in that time, with a EFL cup exit and we're in really bad state as these opportunities we keep getting of staying in the mix will disappear in this next period.

it's when the premier league really takes shape and teams start to pull away or get into trouble.

Despite our inconsistencies we can still put it right, but I think it's definitely the last chance we get.

I think if that chance goes Ange is done and won't be here to see us rocking next year.
 
Points and where we sit in the league is an obvious yardstick to how we are doing, but not how we are doing it! If I want to watch basketball I'll tune in to the NBA!
Lets get Ange and Ange -Ball out of The Lane, sooner rather than later.
 
Of course I'm gonna disagree and you have only listed the games where he came out on top and failed to acknowledge Palace, Ipswich, Fulham, Roma etc. If you find Ange-Ball exciting because most of the time it's like a basketball game, ok! But for me I like/need to see a bit more "finesse" nouse and control when watching Spurs and this bloke is incapable of supplying that imo.
Opinions! I'm sure there's a big camp of Ange In. I'm in the other camp.
Fullham and Roma were draws not losses.
Do you consider draws to be losses?
 
and they all had harry kane up front
Yes, but also Eric Dier and Davinson Sanchez and Serge Aurier in the backline, you know.
Give those defenders to Ange system and see us leaking 100+ goals across league season, mate.

he is with us because he put 3 goals on ten haag, 4 on emery ,4 on pep, and knocked city out of the cup ,plays entertaining front foot football not gutless boring crap like other managers.

But also lost from being 2:0 up against Brighton.
Gave first wins of the whole season to Palace and Ipswich.
And in Fulham game the foot was in front of other foot to trip over really.

Basically this "front foot football" happens in every 2nd game. In games between there is that kind of slouching around with zero fucks given.
And that is amateur league stuff.

So obviously there are things that go in favor of him / are massive positives.
And there are things that go against him / are massive negatives.
 
Fullham and Roma were draws not losses.
Do you consider draws to be losses?

You clearly do not grasp the expectation levels here, do ya ?

YES - playing Europa League home game against side like Roma, draw = loss. Before that game we had won 10 Europa League home games in a row. It was total shit result.
YES - playing Fulham at home and finishing with 1 point absolutely is a loss, there is even no question about it.
 
I feel we have both exhausted our points but my main point of contention with him is the broader pattern of excuse-making and deflection like I said previously.

Whilst obviously our injury concerns are valid and he has the right to use that to excuse our performance if he wishes, I think by doing so he is proclaiming that the performance against Fulham would have somehow been better with these players back from injury when the season has shown, even with a fully fuctional squad of our best players, these type of results continue to happen, hence why I think it's pure deflection.

Having key players out is a valid factor, but it doesn’t fully account for why similar tactical and structural issues were evident throughout the season against teams that frankly, we should be beating when the squad was mostly fit or fully fit, it screams of self-preservation in this instance, even if it's true in isolation.

I respect your perspective, and I agree that stability at the club is important. But stability without progress feels like stagnation to me, even regression in this instance.

My critique is simply about ensuring the club doesn’t settle for mediocrity. If Ange wants to succeed, he needs to show adaptability and stop leaning on narratives to protect his ego and image and start working on solutions imo.

Anyway, nice debate mate, appreciate the lengthy discussion.

This would only be valid if he hadn't taken responsibility for some of the things you're talking about in previous pressers after previous losses, which he has.

after Brighton he took responsibility for the players poor competitivness in the second half.

After the Palace game he said he had to do better in ensuring the team retain composure in games where it's a highly physical battle.
 
There is some precedent in decent January incomings to be fair - Deki and Bentancur both arrived in the same January.

That said it's absolutely not the norm and I wouldn't be expecting anything this time.
It was also Conte’s first window, and whilst both players have more than proved their worth now, at the time many fans were less than inspired by “Juve bench fodder” as they were labelled.

Most January windows under ENIC have been utter arse.

If Ange is binned before the window maybe a new manager would get that sort of thing, but if he’s here? Levy WILL be considering his options at this point, make no mistake. And that may well be wait until the end of the season, which would make him hesitant to seriously back Ange in January. Regardless of whether the squad needs it or not.
 
It was also Conte’s first window, and whilst both players have more than proved their worth now, at the time many fans were less than inspired by “Juve bench fodder” as they were labelled.

Most January windows under ENIC have been utter arse.

If Ange is binned before the window maybe a new manager would get that sort of thing, but if he’s here? Levy WILL be considering his options at this point, make no mistake. And that may well be wait until the end of the season, which would make him hesitant to seriously back Ange in January. Regardless of whether the squad needs it or not.

Uuuuggggghhhhh

Most January transfer windows are shit for all teams. There is a very very good reason for it.
 
I'm starting to grasp everyone's hatred of ENIC & Levy and their lack of buying top notch players, BUT...if it's a result based business, why is the majority on here so negative about 2 draws?

Imagine if we'd had six losses in a row like Citeh?

Barring more injuries, I still think this team & manager can succeed.

I think the issue you’re facing is not having much in the way of comparable context due to as you say only having started supporting us when we got Ange.

You’re right, we haven’t lost six in a row like City. Last season we did lose 3 in a row, and toward the end of the season we actually lost 5 out of 6, 4 of which were in a row but we then beat a very poor Burnley 2-1 (in which we struggled) before losing a 5th out of six, so very easily could have lost 6 in a row.

This season, we’re not losing in a row so much, but we’re doing something which is equally as unhelpful, which is winning one, losing one, winning one, losing one. There’s no consistency, but I know you get this as I’m sure I’ve read posts of yours where you’re agreeing this is an issue.

I think in terms of progress, others here have seen the Poch years,the Jol years, and the Redknapp years where we still had plenty of inconsistency at times (Poch nailed it best, e.g the last year at the Lane) and I think it was easier there to see a side that was genuinely progressing and getting better and better, whereas atm a lot of people, myself included watch us and it isn’t a case of improvement, but just having no idea what version of us turns up.

I think it’s great you’re positive, and I don’t mean that to sound patronising. I’ll also always welcome new fans, but o think a lot of people are disagreeing with your view of the progress we are making, because they have seen the progress others have made with our club, and I don’t think they believe that Ange can ever replicate that due to his lack of experience at the top level.
 
Back
Top