Gonna hide this thread after this post it's clearly the most toxic on the forum. Feel like everyone's dug in and it's just getting abusive.
The hardline Ange-defenders act like he did nothing wrong and all his faults were down to external factors, while also acting sanctimonious about the cup win claiming Ange-doubters can't/didn't enjoy it (which is patently bollocks).
The hardline Ange-haters can't see anything good about the guy at all and think the cup win was a fluke and nothing to do with him at all. He's just a lucky, self-serving, snake-oil salesman who had no redeeming qualities and is solely to blame for our current problems.
Think, as always, the truth lies somewhere in between. I think Ange is a very gifted manager with a lot of great qualities, but some colossal flaws too. I've got a massive soft spot for him as a bloke and I think it's clear the players loved him and would've run through brick walls for him, but I also think he's a bit of a bullshit artist and the way he self-mythologises is extremely calculated and often disingenuous.
Overall, I'll always love what he did for us as the cup-win was one of the highlights of my Spurs supporting life and in many ways he embodies exactly what I want from a Spurs manager: brave, proud, inspiring. But fuck me, his tactics weren't half naive and his pig-headedness around how we set up, rushing players back from injury, not adapting to game-state caused us lots of problems. I think had he stayed the 3rd season would've been bad and he would've been sacked before Christmas - everyone and their dog had our number and we were such an easy mark.
Frank was fucking shit, but I have zero faith that Ange would've had a glorious resurgence. Think sacking him was, ultimately, correct. We just picked the worst possible replacement.
Anyway, enjoy ripping the shit out each other