Completely agree.Yeah, there's clearly been a big shift in the top PL clubs towards buying much younger. Chelsea are obviously the extreme example and we're basically doing a watered down version of their model.
Thing is, Chelsea spent 1 billion quid and played the numbers game. If you do that you're almost guaranteed to land a few superstars and they managed it with Palmer, Caiceido and Estevao. Without Palmer breaking through they may well have ended up in a similar spot to us as their form under Lampard as interim and Poch's first 6 months was bottom half.
Overall in terms of talent we've done pretty well too as Vuskovic and Bergvall look like they could be genuine stars, but we've not invested enough money to prevent the entire team tanking. Chelsea had a massive wobble and because we've done an cheap version of them, our wobble has been three times worse.
I guess we've also spent money on established players like Solanke, Kudus, Xavi and Gallagher, but even then the profiling has often been iffy and there's a serious lack of cohesion in the squad building - that's the stuff that Brighton and Brentford are incredible at. Every signing as a path to minutes and is designed to suit their house style.
Lange is a fraud and if he get relegated he deserves a massive share of the blame.
There is a massive lack of character and common sense within Spurs leadership roles as well.
These are supposed to be the best football can offer, but even us fans on TFC could make better decisions for the football club.
When we signed club signing Djed Spence, a player Conte didnt want, that really emphasised this club will never be serious. Those are the types of signings that declines a football team, amongst others including Richarlison, Odobert, Tel and Johnson.
Johnson did win us the EL so credit there.