Ideally yes but tbh Footballs dead and boring anyway. It’s morphed into logos battling it out.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Absolutely. But there's a difference between that and ordering a specific individual's death, because he's written things you don't like.
Bill Madrid
might think you're involved in some false equivalencing, here - and I'd agree with him.
Said it better than I could so...^THIS
Given the ever climbing revenues, surely a salary cap will just mean more profits for the owners ?
Absolutely. But there's a difference between that and ordering a specific individual's death.
Nope no difference whatsoever for me, morals go out of the window long before the billion mark.
Plus he got caught ordering someone’s death, doesn’t mean the other haven’t.
99% of Geordies are in heaven .
Mike Ashley another super cunt is gone.
We are just cannon founder .
Mike Ashley another super cunt is gone.
We are just cannon founder .
The law disagrees with you.
FWIW we’re not. We generate so, so much more money than is reflected in our level of investment.
God turning down the thermostat and handing out the T-shirts as we type.
True but our cunts couldn't give a fuck .
So we ain't at the races .
Where's it all gone???? :lamelashock:
The law is set by the people who govern us. The people who govern us are influenced and financed by billionaires en masse. Up to 1/3 of them provide donations to the Tory party, I doubt they're doing it because of their passion for politics.
Legal doesn't = moral. Billionaires shouldn't exist, British law allowing them to doesn't mean the law is justifiable or correct. Many of the Saudi practises people are outraged over here are technically done within their own nations laws.
Law disagrees.
Amazingly flawed basis for judgement; but why let that stop you!?!?!?
It definitely would, but it also keeps clubs from going out and having a squad like City and Chelsea who have players on their benches, who make outrageous wages, that would start every game for us. I'll just use Pulisic as an example. Chelsea paid 70m for him and he's on 150k a week and he rarely plays. If there were a cap they'd have top prioritize talent and players like Pulisic would be regulars on mid table teams, which would make them more competitive.
A cap would be more about distribution of talent and not slowing profit.
Last edited:
Also who has Jeff Bezos actually killed? I mean denied a few toilet breaks and decimated the Highstreet sure...By the way anyone with an answer might want to consider how litigious he is.Absolutely. But there's a difference between that and ordering a specific individual's death, because he's written things you don't like.
Some in the stadium, a lot in the ancillary projects surrounding the stadium and training ground, a lot covering Covid losses, some sitting on the balance sheet in cash, a small in the scheme of things but telling amount to Levy’s top-of-market salary, the only one in the entire operation.
Anywhere but the dressing room, anywhere.
He's about to kill Capt James T Kirk, isn't he?
So basically anyone after a certain level of wealth should be forced to heavily invest into an also-ran football club?
(Of course, I'm being facetious, but still........... How the fuck do you propose we get to the utopia you're suggesting?)
Football clubs would be owned primarily by the fans.
And I don't believe for a second the 'utopia' is possible, the game sold out to the most hardcore forms of capitalism a long, long time ago. There's no point discussing how that might shift because none of the requirements for systemic change currently exist.
He can try man but he took down the Gorn on Ceastus three so good luck!!