The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Look, I'm Welsh. I'm biased, I think Brennan has uses, but those moments should be him coming on against tired legs towards the end of games.
This is a team sport and we look decisively worse as a team when he plays. Our team as it is just isn't good enough for someone who tends to do nothing for 89 minutes who might just pop up with a goal or not.
He's gonna have to work hard to reclaim his spot now, so it's up to him.
Most styles aren’t going to suit him because he isn’t a well rounded player at all.Spurs have changed the way they attack, and for sure it doesn't suit him as a wide player.
Under Frank, Spurs play the ball backwards and kick it long. If they win the knockdown, they don't look to play it behind the defence for runners - instead they look to once again play it backwards, and then move it out too the wings.
Frank = Get the ball down the pitch, then steady the ship without taking risk. No balls played into space - all passes to feet.
This doesn't suit Brennan. He wants to be running onto balls played behind the defenders. He likes to ghost defenders and occupy dead space on the pitch - but Frank wants our players tight to theirs (even when we have the ball), through fear of what happens if we lose it.
He can play RW at a lesser club, or off of the main ST, as a CF type. But hes not what we need right now on the wing.Most styles aren’t going to suit him because he isn’t a well rounded player at all.
Probably cos he didn't start in most of our more difficult games this season: Chelsea, Woolwich, Villa, PSG x2.Stat of the day....
Spurs get better results, score more goals, and concede less goals with BJ in the starting 11.......
STARTS : 10 Games / 5 win, Draw 3, 2 loss | 21 Goals , 9 Goals Against
DIDN'T START : 13 Games / 5 win, 3 draw, 6 loss | 20 Goals 20 Goals Against
Probably cos he didn't start in most of our more difficult games this season: Chelsea, Woolwich, Villa, PSG x2.
If you think Johnson would've changed those results then all the more power to you. But you might need a lobotomy.
Stat of the day....
Spurs get better results, score more goals, and concede less goals with BJ in the starting 11.......
STARTS : 10 Games / 5 win, Draw 3, 2 loss | 21 Goals , 9 Goals Against
DIDN'T START : 13 Games / 5 win, 3 draw, 6 loss | 20 Goals 20 Goals Against
This shows how stats can be so misleading.Stat of the day....
Spurs get better results, score more goals, and concede less goals with BJ in the starting 11.......
STARTS : 10 Games / 5 win, Draw 3, 2 loss | 21 Goals , 9 Goals Against
DIDN'T START : 13 Games / 5 win, 3 draw, 6 loss | 20 Goals 20 Goals Against
The best thing Frank has done so far is relegating this fucker to the bench at best. Absolute nothing footballer.
View: https://x.com/mcgrathmike/status/1999508866271268936?s=46
Selling Johnson would be the best piece of business the club has done in a decade, probably since signing Sonny.
yea bet theyd gobble that right up, only like 80m difference in value between the players.Can't we just do a straight swap for Wharton, let Palace keep the excess we paid for Johnson. Basically we paid about twice for Johnson what they paid for Wharton.
He did score the winning goal in the EL. That’s got to be worth more dough.Well we'll just value Johnson at £100m and then present the swap deal.
Now I've gone and deleted my post by mistakeHe did score the winning goal in the EL. That’s got to be worth more dough.