• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Match Brighton & Hove Albion vs Tottenham Hotspur - Sunday 6th October - 16:30KO

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

I cant understand my team losing a game of football and feeling as though I've been entertained. Even if the game was objectively a good watch.

When we were looking for a manager last summer. I got sick and tired of hearing "All Spurs fans want is a team that entertains". As though we'd all clap like seals if someone balanced the ball on the end of their nose whilst we were getting done 5-2. I wanted a proactive manager 16/17 months ago, because I felt that this was the best way for us to be a good team in this day and age. But make no mistake, those periods, when we were winning games under Conte and Mourinho, I was entertained.
His comments about entertaining and hopefully get the result don’t make sense. As we hardly attacked in the 2nd half. Their goalie had one attempt to save. All this BS about us attacking at 2-0. It wasn’t like that really. They scored early on in 2nd half. It wasn’t even a transition. One of their goals started from their goalie and they scored 5 passes later.
 
My problem is we had the game won at HT...

If that was City, Woolwich, Liverpool .. 2-0 up at HT, they SEE THE GAME OUT... no one is gonna criticise them if they don't attack all second half and win 7-0...

We were IN Control... We had them where we wanted them...

The FUCK did Ange say to them at HT??

YOU'VE WON THIS, JUST GO ALL OUT FIR 3, 4 AND 5...

cos that's not how the PL works...

Their goal on 47 mins was the warning signs... But we didn't heed them ... We'd win 5-1 OBVIOUSLY!

THE EQUALISER was panic stations... It was only gonna end one way...
3-2, there you go...

Naively, I genuinely thought we'd beat them 4-3... Like the SKY SPORTS Classic Liverpool/Newcastle matches they always bang on about...

But we're not either of them...

We just surrender to MIGHTY BRIGHTON at 2-0 up...
Fucking idiot pricks!
Partly true but dippers would keep the tempo up and go get 3 or4 like they did v us last season. We just dropped our intensity and stopped doing things properly whilst they upped their work rate which we did not match.
 
We would have been 1-0 up in 2 minutes if timo had been able to play a simple ball to Brennan.

He also can’t score anything ever. He just shouldn’t be starting matches for a serious team and we have levy /Enic to thank for him.

He’s not solely at fault for yesterday but he definitely didn’t help.
Well we still would have only gotten a point.

Which is my point, really, he's not even very much at fault for yesterday. All we had to do is not concede 3 goals in 45 minutes - the lion's share of that blame falls on our defenders who are habitually praised and yet comprise one of the leakiest units in club history.

But, yes, we need better than Werner. We have 2 players who are preferred to Werner and both were our injured this weekend. Werner was brought back because he was a relatively cheap and easy insurance policy. Similar to Dier being brought back into the squad last winter, when a position is hit with a cluster of injuries you end up playing someone you'd prefer not.
 
Defending requires discipline but also - there’s that old adage - you defend as a unit, which you’ve described above.

I can only think of two back lines that I had confidence in at Spurs…

Walker - King - Woodgate/Dawson - Assou-Ekotto

Parker screening

And

Walker - Alderweireld - Vertonghen - Rose

Dembele screening.

Not everyone will agree with the above, but we have rarely been renowned for good defending in my time as a Spurs fan.

I felt those back 4s, particularly the latter knew what their jobs were. Funnily enough, Walker is in both.

At the moment, despite what could be said that is good about our back 4, there is a lack of discipline and attention and togetherness at times and we really do get punished when that happens.
So what you’ve outlined there is the need for proper steel in front of the back 4. I wouldn’t say we have that right now
 
After having time to reflect.
I'm still angry at Ange, he looked bemused, he wasnt barking instructions and was not motivating players from the touchline.
Secondly, we have no ruthless leader who can lift players when times are difficult.
Its going to be a roller coaster season and we're gonna have to get used to it.
Onwards and Upwards
COYS
Your point about us needing a ruthless leader is spot on, our team is full of nice guys who don't have the spark in them to really stand up and give everyone in the team a good kick up the ass when it's duly needed.

Sonny is wayyyy too much of a soft touch and should never of been chosen as captain - I am willing to die on this hill.

Levy and Lange want a group of players that will gel and have minimal disharmony within the group. That's reasonable on paper, but what you're missing is having feisty but intelligent personality types who are willing to cause disharmony in the short term, for the sake of the long term. Players who are willing to stand up and speak up when the team need a good talking to about their attitude, whether that's on the training pitch or during the heat of a game when you're failing to adapt and overcome the change in momentum.

We need ruthless leaders but also some high energy terrier types in midfield like Gallagher, someone who once dispossessed will be hot on your heels immediately frothing at the bit trying to get the ball back, harassing you constantly.

One thing that Mourinho is right about, is we need to be more nasty all over the pitch, dirty tactics (within reason) to reach our objective - which is to win the fuggin game, every game, even if it means breaking a few nails in the process!

One thing I would do if I was manager, would be to tell the players to cut out the theatrics when being challenged, and keep on your feet. It sends a message to other teams that you're a bunch of hard bastards! I would only tell them to perform this south american inspired theatrics in the penalty box.


Your other point largely nullifies my argument in support of Ange, whereby I was saying he's not subbing off certain low performing players, because he wants to see how they respond to shock and adversity without him needing to spoon feed them stuff if he's already told them a thousand times in training.

But clearly these players need a good head wobble and reminder to play with heart and grit. But here's where Ange has gone wrong - when the momentum has clearly shifted significantly against them, give them 5, maybe ten MAX to sort things out, but if they are still under the cosh and haven't got their shit together....that's when you start spouting orders.....but christ if they're additionally letting in goals for fun, then that's when you start acting like a raging banshee if necessary, as the players have clearly completely lost control of the game and are at a loss at how to adapt - THIS is when you need leadership from you manager and captain the most.

The fact that the barking orders part was completely absent with Ange throughout the entirety of the period we started letting in goals for fun....that to me is odd by its own admission and sad!
 
Last edited:
Your point about us needing a ruthless leader is spot on, our team is full of nice guys who don't have the spark in them to really stand up and give everyone in the team a good kick up the ass when it's duly needed.

Sonny is wayyyy too much of a soft touch and should never of been chosen as captain - I am willing to die on this hill.

Levy and Lange want a group of players that will gel and have minimal disharmony within the group. That's reasonable on paper, but what you're missing is having personalities who are willing to cause disharmony in the short term for the sake of the long term, players who are willing to stand up and speak up when the team need a good talking to about their attitude, whether that's on the training pitch or during the heat of a game.

We need ruthless leaders but also some high energy terrier types in midfield like Gallagher, someone who once dispossessed will be hot on your heels immediately frothing at the bit trying to get the ball back, harassing you constantly.

One thing that Mourinho is right about, is we need to be more nasty all over the pitch, dirty tactics (within reason) to reach our objective - which is to win the fuggin game, every game, even if it means breaking a few nails in the process!


Your other point largely nullifies my argument in support of Ange, whereby I was saying he's not subbing off certain low performing players, because he wants to see how they respond to shock and adversity without him needing to spoon feed them stuff if he's already told them a thousand times in training.

But clearly these players need a good head wobble and reminder to play with heart and grit. But here's where Ange has gone wrong - when the momentum has clearly shifted significantly against them, give them 5, maybe ten MAX to sort things out, but if they are still under the cosh and haven't got their shit together....that's when you start spouting orders.....but christ if they're additionally letting in goals for fun, then that's when you start acting like a raging banshee if necessary, as the players have clearly completely lost control of the game and are at a loss at how to adapt - THIS is when you need leadership from you manager and captain the most.

The fact that the barking orders part was completely absent with Ange throughout the entirety of the period we started letting in goals for fun....that to me is odd by its own admission and sad!
Listen to the Up Front with Simon Jordan interview with Jaap Stam. He said there were players at United who wouldn't even acknowledge each other off the training or match pitch. He was saying it made no difference to them as a team on the pitch. They all knew exactly what was required of them on the pitch and got on with it.
 
Listen to the Up Front with Simon Jordan interview with Jaap Stam. He said there were players at United who wouldn't even acknowledge each other off the training or match pitch. He was saying it made no difference to them as a team on the pitch. They all knew exactly what was required of them on the pitch and got on with it.
Thanks mate, will have a look. It's a solid insider perspective I'd imagine. Good team spirit and cohesion is important for obvious reasons, but you're all here to do a job, and each player serves a slightly different individual purpose, but collectively they all need to understand the psychological fundamentals of how to play as a team, respond to adversity and adapt the level of aggression to each moment during the game. We want our players to act like men with grit - blood, sweat and tears if necessary. Not shin pads, crying to the ref over spilt milk and doing goofy goal celebrations!
 
Brighton are a well organised team despite what some think, they were above us in the table,they had an advantage in as much they didn't have to play in Europe on Thursday.ease up ,there is a good team in there somewhereCOYS
Yes Brighton are very good team, they are sold strong unbeatable. There is no shame at all surrendering 2-0 first half lead and leave with nothing. They are a big club, top 4 contender no doubt.
 
Ange Postecoglou has been asked how Spurs keep it "controlled" this afternoon...He says: "We don’t."Let’s keep it open, that way we entertain everyone and hopefully get the result we want."

This is exactly why we will go fk all with this guy unfortunately. Amongst many reasons. It's just so naive and daft.

The guy still won't learn though. He will repeat the same thing in two weeks time. Can you ever imagine Arteta, Pep or Mourinho saying this?

Laughable.
I mean that answer is like some 5 yr old playing with their toys. Surely a grown man nearly 60 with years of managerial experience doesn’t say that. It’s beyond words! What sort of message is that to the players. What I want to know is what was entertaining from a spurs pov in that 2nd half. The guy is in cloud cooku land and he says he always wins a trophy in his 2nd year!
 
No those are mistakes, and they WILL happen which is why a system that is so risk to reward centered and depends on minimal defensive errors is coaching in ( baking in ) results exactly like today's and that is my point. Play like this you will joyfully get games like United play like this you will get Brighton. That's why I have an abiding sadness that this won't work in the EPL. Do you understand?
But those mistakes could happen in any system or even when winning 5-0. What risk / reward is there when bents doesn’t get to ball first? How many times do you players put the ball out or clear it for a corner. That is just basics of defending. We are not going to retrieve the ball from that position and go up the other end and score a goal. In fact how many goals do we actually score from when our defenders have the ball and play ping pong for 5 minutes then actually move it forward and get into pen box?
 
Just when you start to believe again. Buzzing at that first half, went for a piss at half time , heard a muted roar and thought we had scored again. Fucking wrong!
Could not believe our inability, or indeed unwillingness to win a second ball for most of the second half.
This is squarely on the players, dreadful defending and an abrogation of personal responsibility. You can pick out any individuals but too many senior players went missing and we fall further behind our competitors.
At least I didn’t have a 4 hour drive home from an away game.
Put some players who are gonna get stuck in. At bergvhall makes tackles. How many challenges did you see Timo and Johnson make. MADDs for all the criticism he gets he does press well and win the ball back.
 
Same with me. I'm not Ange-out or anything, but his naivety and lack of basic game management skills really winds me up.

I get that he has a philosphy and he's all-in on it, but Christ if a player isn't performing, bring him off. It's not controversial.
Yes regardless of the system abd philosophy if player is having mate sub him. What was so wrong in bringing on Spence for either Porro or destiny?
 
I think Ange is still at a place of development where he is willing to risk the battle of a game to see if his players have the mettle for a war. These losses expose the weaknesses in players that provides a reality check for where we really are. There is obviously still a lot of work to do.
How many reality checks do you need? How many times last season did we son or another player front up and say performance was not acceptable? See it twice may be and should be astute enough to know what is what.
 
Back
Top