I'm making it easier for you. I'm gauging that you're possibly on the spectrum, so every little helps.
How nice of you to call me a retard though. Cute,
Clearly your eyes aren't working then considering you've described parts of his game that simply didn't happen against Chelsea.
The fact you think the best striker in the world was above average in a game where he had zero shots on target and was marked out of the game tells me you probably don't actually remember the game.
Oblivious?
I've discussed NUMEROUS times the tactics we employed and praised our defence. Defensively, it worked against Chelsea. That's never been in question.
But if you seriously believe we went into the game wanting to draw it and to nullify Kane as some sort of sacrifice for defensive solidarity then probably calling you an idiot was too much praise.
You mention my reading skills yet can't even quote the correct words I say.
You keep bringing up cleansheets, top of the league, best defence yadayadayada - and I keep asking you what THOSE have to do with Kane's performance against Chelsea?
They are different subjects. Yes, we're top of the league. Because we've got more points than 18 other teams. Yes, we kept a cleansheet and have the best defence, because defensively we were solid.
I'll ask you again though, this time put the kettle on, make yourself a cuppa and really soak this one in:
What have THOSE things in particular got to do with Kane's performance against Chelsea?
Yeah, Kane is having a great season. 7 goals and 9 assists in the league. Spurs are having a great season. Top of the league after 10 games. One of the top scoring teams with the best defence. Excellent performance so far.
Sadly, the same can't be said Kane's individual performance against Chelsea. Which, again, was below average.