The article raises some good points - and while I'm fervently pro-1882 there will be some 'teething problems', and then other problems, and then some more, just like in growing up as indiviadual
However, I want to pick up this idea of 'two dark decades without the prospect of a trophy'
The last time we went two decades without a trophy, let alone the 'prospect of one' was the 1930s and 40s, dark decades indeed for many reasons, but surely not what the author is referring to?
Because hardly any of the current STs he's referring to were going to games then.
I suspect he's referring to the 90s and noughties. In which case, if he has forgotten so quickly, we won two trophies in the 90s and one in the noughties. We also reached several other semi-finals, so far from the 'prospect of no trophies' we had a very real prospect of at least 5 trophies, maybe as many as 7, and we realized our aim on 3 occasions.
If you want to talk about 'dark trophyless' decades, well we're currently suffering one, again a fact that seems at odds with the writer's analysis of where we are today compared to where we were.
The author's views on this are worth noting and correcting, because they represent an oft held myth, that it's fantastic today compared to how terrible it was twenty years. But at least most who peddle that incorrect view (IMHO) don't make the mistake of forgetting our last three trophies.
Also this 'appalling football, substandard players,' compared to what we get today. We're talking Lineker , Gascoigne, Ginola Klinsmann, Berbatov, Keane, King, Bale, Modric amongst others who played in those decades. Was beating Reading 6-4 so much worse than beating Hull 1-0? Was beating Woolwich and Chelsea 5-1 so much worse than drawing with Chelsea 1-1 and losing to Woolwich 1-0. Of course there are many counter examples, but did the writer actively follow us during those two 'dark decades'? There are a lot of people (not me BTW) who preferred the Jol years to the AVB years so far.
Oh and I agree with Raiders' point, sitting in silence does make you a worse fan, and those who mainly are vocal in criticising our players, are far worse than that. To me they're not even fans/supporters, they're just people who pay money to hinder our team.