• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management ENIC

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

ENIC In or ENIC Out


  • Total voters
    209
But do we want players who are “willing to come” predicated on a high salary? Ange himself says we just want players who want to play for us. Does paying a player £250k a week make much of a difference from paying one £300k a week? Possibly would, but do we want such players?

Yes if they're worth 300k a week. I.e. a final piece of a jigsaw that transitions us from challengers to contenders
 
May Amanda deliver us from the shackles of ENIC

joy-of-receiving-answers-to-your-prayers-300x194.jpg
Is she the saviour
 
Lots of players, the ones who actually win you stuff which we never do.
Would you want the job of deciding who is definitely going to be successful enough to justify a transfer of tens of millions and a salary of almost £100m over a five year period? That would melt my brain.

The only way that you can make decisions like that is to know you’ve a squad full of similar players, so if anyone fails, the effect is less. We aren’t anywhere near that and it’ll be years before we can be.
 
Would you want the job of deciding who is definitely going to be successful enough to justify a transfer of tens of millions and a salary of almost £100m over a five year period? That would melt my brain.

The only way that you can make decisions like that is to know you’ve a squad full of similar players, so if anyone fails, the effect is less. We aren’t anywhere near that and it’ll be years before we can be.

am I getting paid what they do to make those decisions?

if so yes please mate, I’ll start tomorrow!
 
These rumours of a potential buy out / partial sale / investment etc seem to surface during the business end of every transfer window I can remember.

The window then closes, our squad is left with holes, the latest scapegoat / manager is hacked off......



And the rumours mysteriously go away

:harrylol:
 
But if you align success to higher wages, you have to spend more on transfers too. Unless you are saying we’d be better if we paid our present players more?

And I can’t recall the last player that left us due to salary. Maybe Stephen Carr?

There may have been players in the past that didn’t come here due to salary, but I doubt that’s a major issue anymore.

Not necessarily, we generally spend more than Liverpool nowadays but they can pay players like Salah £400k a week and Van Dijk £250k a week and yet they still manage to win, reason is they can attract and keep the best players.

That's the bridge we need go gap.
 
Would you want the job of deciding who is definitely going to be successful enough to justify a transfer of tens of millions and a salary of almost £100m over a five year period? That would melt my brain.

The only way that you can make decisions like that is to know you’ve a squad full of similar players, so if anyone fails, the effect is less. We aren’t anywhere near that and it’ll be years before we can be.

Gareth Southgate of football chairmen
 
Back
Top