A very good and difficult question to answer, particularly when it is posed to individuals who have no powers to execute (I use that term advisedly)the removal. I'm not happy with our style of play or the running of the Club on the playing side and would like the Board to be more proactive in reining in Levy's involvement and influence in that area. This should be relatively easy to achieve under the articles of association, he's not the owner ffs and only holds just shy of a 30% stake in the Club.I am just curious and I mean this as a genuine question now for everyone, Levy in, Levy out, fuck Levy etc.
I don't care where you stand, just a simple question that requires a simple answer, no goalpost shifting, no deflection, just a straightforward honest answer.
Ok, the question...
At what point does Daniel Levy's position become untenable to you as an individual?
Again, straightforward question, just want to know what everyone's breaking point is and get a sense of what it will actually take for different posters.
Failing that, since his position is commensurate with his business acumen and expertise then performance has to be looked at from a perspective of both the on and off field activities therefore from a business viewpoint success can come in many forms and I suppose relegation stands out as the ultimate failure and the most likely reason to wield the axe.