I wonder if Man U fans would rather have Levy than that Rat?
Not defending levy at all but If it was a choice between him or rathcliffe I’m going for baldy every time
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Management ENIC
- Thread starter The Fighting Cock
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Not defending levy at all but If it was a choice between him or rathcliffe I’m going for baldy every time
Oh certainly.
I ain't a Levy fan but we have 100% dodged a bullet by having Rathcliffe buy United rather than us.
The Trust using 'Change' to try and look relevant.
View: https://x.com/THSTOfficial/status/1890457641073160463?t=rCLA-pOtSjZDH5FSht4rOg&s=19
View: https://x.com/THSTOfficial/status/1890457641073160463?t=rCLA-pOtSjZDH5FSht4rOg&s=19
I have to applaud the amazing work from Change For Tottenham. They have propelled this issue into the mainstream like no one before. I particularly want to thank one of the organisers Jay who has appeared on various podcasts and shows. He speaks well, is likeable and most importantly has no ego in his role.
Daniel Levy protests: Would chairman ever leave Spurs amid fan protests?
With Tottenham struggling on the pitch and chairman Daniel Levy facing criticism from fans, BBC Sport looks at how the club is run and what the future might hold.www.bbc.co.uk
Last edited:
Usual slovenly reporting from Talkshite , last season Spurs revenue was £615 million , actually it was Euros you muppets, anyway Levy still has his fans in Aaron.
talksport.com
Lennon makes passionate Levy defence but says Spurs owner 'should've spent more'
Former Tottenham winger Aaron Lennon insists fans ‘don’t quite realise’ how deeply chairman Daniel Levy cares about the club. Lennon’s defence as a number of fans gather for…
talksport.com
I'm posting this here, because I truely believe that PSR and the litigation against City is a ploy by unambitious owners to hamstring ambitious owners.
The headline reads huge blow to the premier league. How is it a huge blow? Sponsors wanting to pump money into the league is a blow? Its only a blow to owners like Levy who are made to look foolish by their lack of ambition and interest in their clubs.
Rightly so, this should be viewed as a restriction of trade.
The PFA will also launch legal action against PSR IMO. Its a stealth salary cap.
These rules are always fought by City, Newcastle, Villa, Chelsea and Notts Forest. Basically the teams that are trying to win something.
www.bbc.co.uk
The headline reads huge blow to the premier league. How is it a huge blow? Sponsors wanting to pump money into the league is a blow? Its only a blow to owners like Levy who are made to look foolish by their lack of ambition and interest in their clubs.
Rightly so, this should be viewed as a restriction of trade.
The PFA will also launch legal action against PSR IMO. Its a stealth salary cap.
These rules are always fought by City, Newcastle, Villa, Chelsea and Notts Forest. Basically the teams that are trying to win something.
Premier League sponsorship rules 'void' says tribunal
The Premier League's rules governing sponsorship deals from the period between between 2021 and 2024 are "void and unenforceable", a tribunal rules.
www.bbc.co.uk
The Trust using 'Change' to try and look relevant.
View: https://x.com/THSTOfficial/status/1890457641073160463?t=rCLA-pOtSjZDH5FSht4rOg&s=19
If the Qataris took over and spent lots of money on players I’d be more than happy for Levy to stay simply because of his financial,abilities. Sadly though any demonstrations against him on Sunday might deter the Qataris from making an offer.
We're probably the only big club that would hand out commemorative gold watches before the final has even been played.
What a fantastic example of the losing mentality that was
It's wonderful isn't it.
Any rules that are "illegal" should not be in place. It is arbitration, so not binding beyond the PL nor has it been tested by the courts but I am not going to squabble. I fail to see why anyone would disagree with that; obviously we don't want illegal rules.I'm posting this here, because I truely believe that PSR and the litigation against City is a ploy by unambitious owners to hamstring ambitious owners.
The headline reads huge blow to the premier league. How is it a huge blow? Sponsors wanting to pump money into the league is a blow? Its only a blow to owners like Levy who are made to look foolish by their lack of ambition and interest in their clubs.
Rightly so, this should be viewed as a restriction of trade.
The PFA will also launch legal action against PSR IMO. Its a stealth salary cap.
These rules are always fought by City, Newcastle, Villa, Chelsea and Notts Forest. Basically the teams that are trying to win something.
Premier League sponsorship rules 'void' says tribunal
The Premier League's rules governing sponsorship deals from the period between between 2021 and 2024 are "void and unenforceable", a tribunal rules.
The next battle ground will be salary caps, which are quite common, although not in the form of "anchoring".
I don't personally know any United fans who'd be aroused by the prospect of hotels, property and racing tracks at the expense of their football team but I suppose there may be some out there.
How do you come to that conclusion?
On the contrary. It would make an offer more appealing.
Any new owners would see a disgruntled fan base as an opportunity to come in and immediately be seen as saviours.
It's very rare that a club with popular owners changes hands.
It's not like the much more antagonistic demonstrations against Ashley stopped the Saudi takeover.
It’s an interesting article and glad it is on the BBC website getting more attention to our need for change. Would love to know who the sources were though.
I think we don’t need to search too hard for the source of the last quote, that gas-lighting old cunt Cullen…
They believe a "vocal minority" of fans simply want success now, but should be careful what they wish for with calls for change.
They added: "Spurs haven't got the formula on the pitch just yet but it will come."
I think we don’t need to search too hard for the source of the last quote, that gas-lighting old cunt Cullen…
They believe a "vocal minority" of fans simply want success now, but should be careful what they wish for with calls for change.
They added: "Spurs haven't got the formula on the pitch just yet but it will come."
False dichotomy.
All these things ADD to the playing squad.
Try to understand simple things.
Levy was on borrowed time imo hiring that clown AVB. Pochettino gave him breathing space for five years then let himself down sacking a manager who deserved a rebuild. Appreciate what hes done infrastructure wise but let the fans down on the pitch. If Qatari rumours are true then they will take us to top level.