A further consideration with Frank is that he is working under what many perceive to be excellent ownership, under Benham, which would not be the case here under our Daniel.I understand your point mate. It is hard to find a reliable metric. Someone asked how Brentford had done in cups under Frank, like that's a point of reference we should use. Brentford on their shoestring budget v the oil barons of Newcastle and Man City. Unless you get some luck it's a complete mismatch and it's unfair to judge a manager with that level of handicap.
I think we need to look at what he can bring away from results. Development of youth, tactical flexibility, calm demeanour, respect, working within financial constraints.....all attributes Frank has that we would want from a manager at Spurs.
The more people on here talk about him not being the man for the job, the more I'm convinced he is!
Under Daniel, development of youth is that the youth grows in value and gets sold.
I guess time will tell.