• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management ENIC

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

ENIC In or ENIC Out


  • Total voters
    209
It is cute people still dont understand transfers arent all paid in one go. £100m is a good amount. I suspect we will sort naming rights soon now Levy isnt there pissing about with it, which will bring more in.

Maybe, just maybe, they are telling the truth and will give it a go.

It isnt really strange to announce it either, it will appear on Companies House, so it wont exactly be a secret.
This

100M cash injection doesn’t equal 100M to spend in Jan
 
You need a lot more than 100m to sort the bang average quality of our attack.

We spent the best part of a decade quoting clubs well north of 100m for Kane and likely Son too so we should be prepared to spend those kind of sums to bring is quality anywhere near their levels.

Every time I see a lineup and remember Odobert, Tel, Richarlison, Johnson, Solanke are our attacking options it reminds me just how far away from being a top side we currently are.
This isn't how transfers work.
 
It is cute people still dont understand transfers arent all paid in one go. £100m is a good amount.

They can be if you are activating buy out clauses like we tried in the summer.

And if you are buying a 100m player how much is a club putting down initially.. anything from 30-60m would be my guess.

How many players do we need to give us a top 4 quality attack with a couple of bench options of a comparable quality? 4 or 5 I would say.
 
It all just feels hollow and empty without our Daniel at the helm

What would I give to have him back in his rightful place on the Tottenham Hotspur throne , bald head glistening in the glow of the summer sun

Sigh

Still recovering...

Sad Schitts Creek GIF by CBC
 
They can be if you are activating buy out clauses like we tried in the summer.

And if you are buying a 100m player how much is a club putting down initially.. anything from 30-60m would be my guess.

How many players do we need to give us a top 4 quality attack with a couple of bench options of a comparable quality? 4 or 5 I would say.

Well, they do say initial and we do generate and receive a lot of other funds.

As always, it is how it is spent isnt it. We spent £50m on Johnson for example!
 
Yeah you need to spend money to buy players actually, and we spent money on the players I listed which is why they makeup our current attacking options.
No. The whole point of this is to give us greater cash liquidity, we struggled for cash flow before. We will be much better positioned in transfer negotiations when it comes to payment plans. This isn't about chucking down 100 mill for one player, that isn't how football transfers work.
 
Back
Top