I was referring to their financial year end & all PL clubs have the option of moving that back by one month.
The PSR time frame remains the same.
I really don't see the need for a 'disagree' when we could discuss it like adults.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
I was referring to their financial year end & all PL clubs have the option of moving that back by one month.
But I don’t think that changes the PSR period? Anyway, I don’t think either of us or anyone else is an expert in this. Seems flakey as fuck!From the BBC
"Leicester successfully argued that because their 2022-23 accounting period ended on 30 June, they were not longer bound by Premier League rules and so could not be found in breach.
The Foxes had earlier changed the end of their accounting period from 30 May to 30 June, though the commission said there was not "anything untoward" with the move and it complied with accounting rules."
Ah, yes, the following article says they had planned to start the hearing later but they have decided to bring it forward. A decision after appeals is expected by the end of this season still.City case starts in September lasting 12 weeks then 115 separate appeals, verdict expected 2035!
Read somewhere recently that 6 clubs (us, United, Liverpool, United, City, woolwich) produce 48% of all revenue in English football (and the PL produces ≈90%). That sort of imbalance isn't sustainable, and is the primary reason why the Super League feels inevitable.![]()
Apocalypse now: City wrangle shows the wealthiest owners could kill football | Jonathan Wilson
Legal battle between Manchester City and the Premier League highlights the game’s existential crisis – and it may already be too late to save itwww.theguardian.com
City agree to pay a fine of 1,000,000 barrels of oil to the FA and the case is closed.
Hell the FA is slimy enough .![]()
Football regulator given power to block Premier League stadium sales
The government is preparing to give the independent regulator powers to prevent Premier League clubs from selling their stadiums to related or third-party companieswww.theguardian.com
FIFA are not going to like the Government meddling in football administration. They already warned them I believe.![]()
Football regulator given power to block Premier League stadium sales
The government is preparing to give the independent regulator powers to prevent Premier League clubs from selling their stadiums to related or third-party companieswww.theguardian.com
Surprising since both the last world cups were all government meddling.FIFA are not going to like the Government meddling in football administration. They already warned them I believe.
No it will go until 2035 in some form or another. City can just sue at any point which will drag it on longer.