Can only assume they are struggling to find someone to take over. He should be sacked anyway though. The stories coming out are pretty grim.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Can only assume they are struggling to find someone to take over. He should be sacked anyway though. The stories coming out are pretty grim.
That is what I mean, and Santini quit, back in the blessed days when that used to be a thing.Sure some of them were 2nd+ seasons, if that's what you meant. Santini wasn't, though.
If you finish 17th then you're in danger of going down, because you're shit.
That there were 3 sides that were monumentally shit last season doesn't eradicate the fact that we were shit enough to be in a real relegation fight almost any other season.
You don't condition the players to accept and not care about the league performance one season and then just wipe the slate clean the following summer, that 18 month spell under Ange following the first 10 games has done untold damage to this group of players on so many levels, I don't think it's recoverable here for most of them.
But Stellini and Mason was a disaster
why was Ange season 1 so much better? Especially after losing Kane?
How come Frank and Tudor even get to use Ange winning a trophy as an excuse for being shit, but Ange didn’t need to use Stellini and Mason?
That is what I mean, and Santini quit, back in the blessed days when that used to be a thing.
At the end of the day, the reason Frank should have been sacked more quickly is not the results (he got the sack as soon as we really sunk into the relegation mire), it's the culture behind the scenes which is now widely reported to have been curdling rapidly.
Hard to know how Levy would have handled it. The disastrous state he left the club in produced a riskier and worse set of options than he'd ever had to address while he was here.
Had a much better squad at his disposal though.Mason wasn't a disaster in the slightest - he came in and got a couple of wins and a draw off a 3rd placed Man Utd off the back of the wreck that was left after the newcastle humiliation.
Considering the team had mentally checked out for the season, he did a pretty decent job
Nobody was going to be pulling up trees with this bunch, but a stronger character would have had us clear of the drop, I feel confident in that.I feel a bit sorry for Frank.
I really don't think anyone realised how badly damaged this squad was.
I'm not entirely sure anyone could have done much better tbh.
If you finish 17th then you're in danger of going down, because you're shit.
That there were 3 sides that were monumentally shit last season doesn't eradicate the fact that we were shit enough to be in a real relegation fight almost any other season.
You don't condition the players to accept and not care about the league performance one season and then just wipe the slate clean the following summer, that 18 month spell under Ange following the first 10 games has done untold damage to this group of players on so many levels, I don't think it's recoverable here for most of them.
Doesn't need explaining, every year you see shit sides have a small purple patch and be in surprising positions early in the season, eventually the table ends up with teams where they deserve to be.Explain our very good start to this season then...All the Ange haters couldn't wait to tell everyone "look, a proper manager getting more out of these players than shitty Ange could.....see!!! We told you Ange was no good"
WHy can't you and the others accept that this club keeps buying badly in the transfer market. It happened before Ange, during Ange, and after Ange.......our squad isn't good enough, not enough genuine quality, our better players are frustrated by it.
Levy, Paratici and Lange have led us to where we are right now. They built this crap squad that everyone is laughing at and manager after manager is struggling with.
Had a much better squad at his disposal though.
They'd only lost a few games here and there. Had Kane to pull off miracles, too.
Easy. Relatively full health and a weak slate of fixtures happening before we had to start playing twice a week.
I don't recall Amorim bragging that he decided to sack off the League at the mid-way point of last season to try and excuse his abysmal performance so I'm not sure the two examples are really like-for-like.Ok, where did Man Utd finish last season in the league? The Man Utd that lost to us in the EL final
Did they do better in the league this season league position wise until Amorin was sacked?
We were a mess. Remember Stellini and Newcastle away?Mason wasn't a disaster in the slightest - he came in and got a couple of wins and a draw off a 3rd placed Man Utd off the back of the wreck that was left after the newcastle humiliation.
Considering the team had mentally checked out for the season, he did a pretty decent job
We were a mess. Remember Stellini and Newcastle away?
And if you are saying Mason wasn’t a mess, why didnt have to deal with the residual effects of Stellini?
How come it’s only Ange that’s still to blame 2 years later, even though he dramatically improved things from what he inherited?
He brought stability to utter chaos. Which is the case for his appointment now.Mason wasn't a disaster in the slightest - he came in and got a couple of wins and a draw off a 3rd placed Man Utd off the back of the wreck that was left after the newcastle humiliation.
Considering the team had mentally checked out for the season, he did a pretty decent job
There's just less to Ange than both sides of that never-ending debate are willing to admit.How come it’s only Ange that’s still to blame 2 years later, even though he dramatically improved things from what he inherited?
The football was dogshit lol he was like a Temu Jose long before Temu was a thing.True, better than Pochettino. But Conte and Mourinho were not far behind and people generally disliked that era and saw it as a turgid period for the club. Sherwood's win % was higher than Redknapp.
Stats don't always tell the full sentiment I guess
Without Kane tooYes, we were a mess
Mason helped to bring the team back to some semblance of order
We finished 8th that season, 2 points off 6th, on 60 points.
The following season we finished 5th on 66 points. Basically a minor improvement considering there was no mid-season disasters
That’s not the question here,He brought stability to utter chaos. Which is the case for his appointment now.
There's just less to Ange than both sides of that never-ending debate are willing to admit.
He's just a regular football manager with a recklessly aggressive style and a penchant for grandiosity in front of a microphone.
We got the best he was ever going to be able to offer us, and I can't understand people's unwillingness to just thank him and move on.
The football was dogshit lol he was like a Temu Jose long before Temu was a thing.
Same with actual Jose and Conte, to a degree; the football was awful. Mad times. I'd go back to those days in a heartbeat.