What's more piss about this injury was he wasn't even involved in some heavy clatter or impact, not like someone was sent off from his tackle on him whatsoever to even out some advantage. Totally an unlucky freak injury to have.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
I'll be brutally honest here. I don't think this is as big a blow and everyone is making out. We have two big games left this season. and you could argue we might be tactically better set up with more legs in midfield (Sarr or Kulusevski) for both games.
Yes, losing Maddison's creativity is a massive loss. But away in Norway we might be better suited to having a more energetic box to box midfielder like Sarr playing instead as we need to be hard to break down. He's definitely a loss in the final but if Kulusevski was to rediscover his form then he's a better match for that game. I think Ange would have been tempted to play kulusevski with maddison in midfield which might have been overly naive in a final. At least now he has can only play one of them.
Its obviously a blow and I'd love Maddison to be starting the final if we get there. Especially if Kulusevski does not get back to form by then. But I don't think its a complete gamechanger or should be the difference between us winning or losing the Europa league.
An in form Kulusevski provides a lot more energy and covers more ground than Maddison.I think it'll be Bents, Biss and Kulu for our remaining Europa matches, so I'm not sure we'll get those "legs in midfield" anyway
I'll be brutally honest here. I don't think this is as big a blow and everyone is making out. We have max two big games left this season, and you could argue we might be tactically better set up with more legs in midfield (Sarr or Kulusevski) for both games.
Yes, losing Maddison's creativity is a massive loss. But away in Norway we might be better suited to having a more energetic box to box midfielder like Sarr playing instead as we need to be hard to break down. He's definitely a loss in the final but if Kulusevski was to rediscover his form then he's a better match for that game. I think Ange would have been tempted to play kulusevski with maddison in midfield which might have been overly naive in a final. At least now he has can only play one of them. It forces
Its obviously a blow and I'd love Maddison to be starting the final if we get there. Especially if Kulusevski does not get back to form by then. But I don't think its a complete gamechanger or should be the difference between us winning or losing the Europa league.
I'm glad that response wasn't directed at me, because I've always liked Maddison. Could never understand any negativity towards the guy.Waitwaitwait.
I am fully sure that just like 20-30 pages ago he was "total fucking fairy", "pointless player" and all other labels like this!
Despite, you know, him being CONSISTENTLY our best creator whenever the fat and miserable idiot has given him chance to play.
You know being part of 23 goals this season. Out of which 16 in EPL.
Or is it like a seesaw? Once one (Kulusevski) goes down, then other (Madders) goes up and vice versa?
Not directly aimed at you, but generally this kind of group thinking / herd mentality makes my brain explode.
Madders has always been good creative spark. Throughout the season. And in fact Kulusevski has mostly been playing really well too - as his 20 goal contributions prove. On top of covering most ground from all of our players in first half of the season.
Exactly. The injuries to Maddison and Bergval has basically forced Ange to play a more pragmatic formation with just one 10 and that now being Kulusevski. There is even a small chance he starts Sarr over Kulusevski tomorrow night which would make us even more pragmaticOur MF 3 now is Biss, Benta, Deki and that means we are 4-2-3-1 and tbh I think we looked more solid in our press using 4-2-3-1 vs Bodo in the first leg and the whole set up is well-suited to Europa League and SF/Fs.
He might cover more ground but he does stupid running compared to madders. Madders timing of runs into the box or in behind are brilliant and he’s scored some cracking goals because of it. Deki does not give us that. He’s a plodder,cant turn in tight spaces and get away from someone and hasn’t got that execution in his passes. Madders is a massive miss for us.An in form Kulusevski provides a lot more energy and covers more ground than Maddison.
If he rediscovers form then I don't think this is an issue. If he doesn't then we will badly miss Maddison in the final.
Very harsh to describe Kulusevski as a plodder. He's been poor since his injury but on form he is every bit as good as Maddison and offers much more off the ball.He might cover more ground but he does stupid running compared to madders. Madders timing of runs into the box or in behind are brilliant and he’s scored some cracking goals because of it. Deki does not give us that. He’s a plodder,cant turn in tight spaces and get away from someone and hasn’t got that execution in his passes. Madders is a massive miss for us.
Exactly. The injuries to Maddison and Bergval has basically forced Ange to play a more pragmatic formation with just one 10 and that now being Kulusevski. There is even a small chance he starts Sarr over Kulusevski tomorrow night which would make us even more pragmatic
Hope so! I think Kulusevski is now our most important player. We have nobody else available who can play that role.He'll def start Kulusevski IMO
And it's probably a great game for him to pick up some rhythm and conditioning. I think he will probably score.
A plodder as in no change of pace. He’s not smooth and is always trying to shrug people off because he doesn’t have that burst to get away from players. I like Deki but he’s been miles off it for months now and never got his sharpness back since his injury. Hopefully he steps up because we can’t rely on Bentancur,Biss or Sarr to create anything. With Johnson starting too that’s even less creativity in the team.Very harsh to describe Kulusevski as a plodder. He's been poor since his injury but on form he is every bit as good as Maddison and offers much more off the ball.
And I saw the appearance of a rainbow at the Finale as a good sign for the future.I don't care what anybody says, and I don't care if you don't believe in curses and the supernatural.
This club is fucking cursed.
Did we build the stadium on an old Druidic grave site or something?
We've pissed somebody off
He’s not in form though.An in form Kulusevski provides a lot more energy and covers more ground than Maddison.
If he rediscovers form then I don't think this is an issue. If he doesn't then we will badly miss Maddison in the final.
The dilemma for Postecoglou, if we beat Bodo tomorrow, is, should he rest Kulusevski for the final, or try and play him into form in the remaining PL fixtures and risk injury?
The dilemma for Postecoglou, if we beat Bodo tomorrow, is, should he rest Kulusevski for the final, or try and play him into form in the remaining PL fixtures and risk injury?
I'll be brutally honest here. I don't think this is as big a blow and everyone is making out. We have max two big games left this season, and you could argue we might be tactically better set up with more legs in midfield (Sarr or Kulusevski) for both games.
Yes, losing Maddison's creativity is a massive loss. But away in Norway we might be better suited to having a more energetic box to box midfielder like Sarr playing instead as we need to be hard to break down. He's definitely a loss in the final but if Kulusevski was to rediscover his form then he's a better match for that game. I think Ange would have been tempted to play kulusevski with maddison in midfield which might have been overly naive in a final. At least now he has can only play one of them. It forces
Its obviously a blow and I'd love Maddison to be starting the final if we get there. Especially if Kulusevski does not get back to form by then. But I don't think its a complete gamechanger or should be the difference between us winning or losing the Europa league.