Think the one positive of this 'sign em young' approach is it will be easier to find a market for these guys if we do decide to sell.Right idea, right players? Not so sure. Bergvall is really the only one who looks like as close to a sure thing as you can get. Tel, Odo, Gray (more hopeful of, but still), Takai, Drag.... Not so much. That's a lot of money spent.
None will be on big wages and as they're still young, plenty of clubs will be interested.
Reckon we could get our money back (or close enough) for Dragusin and Odobert. Probably can instantly double or triple our money on Takai after half a season of Bundesliga football if he keeps playing. Gray and Tel might be a bit trickier as we paid decent money for them both but I reckon we could find buyers and get a reasonable fee for either if we did decide to move them on.
Meanwhile players like Bergvall (if he can stay fit) and Vuskovic are already worth multitudes of what we paid for em. Would prefer not to sell either, mind.
From a purely business perspective I can see how Levy and the club were drawn to this more Chelsea-like model. With the low wages involved there's far less risk in signing kids. Problem is, we've not signed enough quality first teamers to properly compete while the kids are still developing.
