A . I said eriksen played an important part not pivotal. Once again adding in your own words.
B. Ndombele in the shape of his career is probably 60% of a normal player.
C. No team in premier carries an ndombele type. Liverpool, City, Chelsea would have had him out the door after his first training session.
D. Blind hero worship?? Because i wont criticise a manager who wont play the worst signing in the clubs history
A. Eriksen contributed to 1pt in a season they won the title by 11.
Scored 3, assisted 0
That’s not an important role. You know it isn’t, you just can’t admit that you thought he played more than he did.
B. It matters little, just shows that he’s making an effort with his fitness. Maybe not being dropped for Winks would motivate him further
C. Conjecture. There’s also that little point about those teams being light years ahead of us in central midfield and not having to rely on Winks.
D. No, because you think Winks is shit but are doing everything in your power to justify the manager calling him a very very good player and not transfer listing him
You’ve also called Fabregas a liar because you don’t like the notion that Conte might be restricting flare players from performing naturally.
Defying logic and dismissing accounts from actual footballers, Eriksen included, is hero worship.
Your view was that Eriksens statement was void because he applied himself and adapted for Conte.
You didn’t know he had only played about 3 full Serie A games in 43 though.
That’s why you look stupid claiming he played an important role and implied Conte had used him in an important role once he’d adapted his football.