Vlahovic to scum for 75 million, and 410,000 per week?
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Yup - proactive signings at the beginning of this window would have given this squad a timely boost before the semisNeeded signings in a week ago, we are throwing away key games. Fuck these players and fuck this board.
This is what it takes to sign top players now
These bellends'' are buying a top class player while your cunt boss is building flats instead to sell for profitWho are these bell-ends????
Article states 75m euro.... Headline states £75m.
How can it be am excuse when we lost £100m in revenue last year?


I did not enjoy your essay I am afraid. I have never been into factual / history books always preferring fiction.. I think it is a need for escapism. Now if your Dan had turned out not to be an unscrupulous property developer, but instead was more like Prince Charming who saved the day and married the beautiful princess I could have enjoyed it. Especially the bit where they live happily ever after in a trophy laden castle in North London. Unfortunately your Dan is real and mine is wishful thinkingSo along came Dan a renowned property dealer and developer who had made a fortune when the tide was high. Dan after several years or easy money making decided to buy a run down factory which made electrical equipment that he liked when he was a kid.
Now Dan didn't know anything about manufacturing but he knew all about property and he knew he could get finance to build the most beautiful factory in the world which would surely make the best electrical equipment.
So Dan went out and got that finance. He doubled the shop floor, he made the most beautiful canteen, even put in an amazing gym and gold plated urinal.
Everything was in place. Then Dan realised he'd forgot to buy new machinery, but surely that won't matter thought Dan, I've doubled the floor space.
The old machinery slowly went bad and the plasters he used to hold things together soon fell off. Now Dan's electrical equipment was shit and he could sell diddly. He needed to keep the buyers happy so brought in new factory managers, but they were just more sticky tape really.
Dan's big factory investment meant he had no money left on the company books, it has all been spent on the factory and while he had the world's greatest factory, it no longer produced anything but cheap crap.
Dan ran the factory into the ground and eventually sold the factory, personally pocketing a small fortune, but the company could no longer compete with the competition. Still Dan had managed to make a small fortune having spent very little of his own money - not bad eh!
Thanks Dan, thanks for all your hard work.
I think this is true
Everyone did. It affected everyone.How can it be am excuse when we lost £100m in revenue last year?
The weekly figure is what jumped out at me when I first saw that tweet. That’s what double of Kane? Absolute lunacy.If anyone thought we'd spend £150m in January they need to be sectioned.
No doubt the simpletons will look at the £75m part of that and think we could compete.
Over 5 years, £410k (wherever that came from) is another £106.6m so £181.6m plus bonuses plus agent fees.
what could possible go wrong with this player ?![]()
Tottenham boss Antonio Conte ready to spend £40m on Dejan Kulusevski
Spurs boss Antonio Conte is reportedly ready to spend £40million to bring Dejan Kulusevski to Tottenham Hotspur Stadium this year.tbrfootball.com
Tottenham Hotspur are reportedly ready to spend $55million (£40million) to bring Dejan Kulusevski to Spurs this year.
According to CBS Sports, Tottenham boss Antonio Conte is keen on a swoop for the Juventus talent.
However, this could have consequences with regards to Spurs’ apparent interest in Dusan Vlahovic.
The outlet claims Juve want the Fiorentina star too, but must offload players before submitting a January offer.
Half-Season Team of the Season & Awards | HITC Sevens Christmas Special
And if Tottenham swoop for Kulusevski, this could lead Juve to have the means to trigger a bid for Vlahovic.
Spurs haven’t ruled out signing the Serbia international themselves, added CBS Sports.
That said, Tottenham will surely not shirk from making a bid for Kulusevski just to prevent Juve for moving for Vlahovic.
Could Spurs land “great talent” in January transfer window?
Kulusevski is a superb talent who’d bring a lot to Conte’s side.
He’s a versatile player who can feature in central midfield, at No. 10 and on the wing.
The 21-year-old’s key traits include technique, physicality and unselfishness on the pitch.
Kulusevski even has the Cristiano Ronaldo seal of approval, the Portugal legend calling him “excellent” in 2020.
“He is a great talent,” Ronaldo told the Juve website. “He will help us to win and achieve incredible things.”
As well as Tottenham, north London rivals Woolwich are reportedly also eyeing Kulusevski.
According to Gazzetta dello Sport, the Gunners have been tracking the Sweden international for over three years.
Kulusevski has struggled for game time this season, with just four Serie A starts under his belt.
Indeed, 19 of his appearances for Juve in 2021-22 have come off the bench.
The weekly figure is what jumped out at me when I first saw that tweet. That’s what double of Kane? Absolute lunacy.
I fully agree the club needs to invest but we can do so while still have a modicum of common sense.
Ndombele sign for £55.5m over 6 years so according to FFP is worth £9.25m a yearwonder if we move GLC & Ndombele on for next to nothing that will have an impact on FFP as we paid near £100M 2 years ago get back maybe £30-40M is that an FFP loss of £60M ?
does that then show against what we can spend now ?
FFP is absolutely no barrier to us spending whatsoeverwonder if we move GLC & Ndombele on for next to nothing that will have an impact on FFP as we paid near £100M 2 years ago get back maybe £30-40M is that an FFP loss of £60M ?
does that then show against what we can spend now ?
Never was - only a lie pedalled by ENICucks