• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management Levy / ENIC

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Levy In or Levy Out


  • Total voters
    385
Transfer Net Spend since 2014:
City - £518M
Utd - £466M
Gooners - £225M
Chelsea - £200M
Liverpool - £183M
Spurs - £29M

:levylol:

A bit of a fact check on the Spurs bit at least. Ignores the coinage but the big ticket items show that to be shit. Problem is not really that we haven't spent. It's just that we've spent a lot of it on rubbish.
I don't expect us to compete with Man Citys spend - noone should.

Bought

Ndombele £55m
Sanchez £42m
Reguilon £32m
Sissoko £30m
Berwijn £26m
Royal £26m
Sessegnon £25m
Moura £25m
Aurier £23m
Son £22m
Gil £21m
Janssen £17m
Doherty £15m
Hojbjerg £15m
Alderweireld £11m
Wanyama £11m
Njie £8m
Dele £5m

£364m

Sold

Walker £50m
Trippier £20m
Wimmer £18m
Chadli £13m
Mason £13m
Walker Peters £12m
Sissoko £3m
N'Kooudou £4m
Janssen £6m
Pritchard £8m
Njie £6m
Stamboli £6m

£133m

NET £231m
 
A bit of a fact check on the Spurs bit at least. Ignores the coinage but the big ticket items show that to be shit. Problem is not really that we haven't spent. It's just that we've spent a lot of it on rubbish.
I don't expect us to compete with Man Citys spend - noone should.

Bought

Ndombele £55m
Sanchez £42m
Reguilon £32m
Sissoko £30m
Berwijn £26m
Royal £26m
Sessegnon £25m
Moura £25m
Aurier £23m
Son £22m
Gil £21m
Janssen £17m
Doherty £15m
Hojbjerg £15m
Alderweireld £11m
Wanyama £11m
Njie £8m
Dele £5m

£364m

Sold

Walker £50m
Trippier £20m
Wimmer £18m
Chadli £13m
Mason £13m
Walker Peters £12m
Sissoko £3m
N'Kooudou £4m
Janssen £6m
Pritchard £8m
Njie £6m
Stamboli £6m

£133m

NET £231m
A few left off the sales there if your going back to 2015, Toby, Tom Carroll, Townsend, Paulinho, Capoue, Holtby, Chiriches, Lennon, Soldado. Thats about £60m to £70m
 
A few left off the sales there if your going back to 2015, Toby, Tom Carroll, Townsend, Paulinho, Capoue, Holtby, Chiriches, Lennon, Soldado. Thats about £60m to £70m

Yep it's not the perfect or complete list. I've left a few off the bought list as well. Lo Celso for example as it was 'undisclosed' from what I was looking at but could have been £28m alone.

Just really the idea that we never spend money that's a load of jackanory
 
Both poor decisions and a lack of investment have resulted in Spurs missing out on golden opportunities to win huge trophies, potentially once in a generation opportunities.

One example..
The year that Leicester won the league. And all of the top teams looked cagey.... ....golden opportunity to invest positively in January and bring a pochettino spurs with momentum to a title. December 31st, spurs in 4th and 4 points off top. No transfers or reinforcement.
Spurs finish 3rd and achieved their goal of accessing champions league revenue.

But in the absence of that final push, who knows what could have been. This was during a period of ascension for spurs as a club thanks to Poch. Now we've passed the peak of that ascension and we've been allowed to decline rapidly.

Years and years of building since the Martin Jol era for it all to fall apart withins 3 years, and nothing to show for it bar some enjoyable matches and occasions.

It's like building a house with 80% of your budget, then when you get to the roof deciding to leave it off as it's going to cost alot to add as a finishing touch........ And then it starts raining and you realise, oh...... Probably should have done that... We've got to rebuild the whole house again now as its flooded.
 
If what Fonseca says is true (the he had a deal with the team then Paratici scuttled it because he wanted a defensive manager) then who is really in charge of Spurs? Levy issues statements about the team DNA, the directors want managers who don't get appointed, and we have a Serie A director of operations who seems intent on imposing that style of football on Spurs. So are Jorge Mendes and Paratici running the team now? Is this Lewis sidelining Levy? Is it a plan or just the idea that you can assemble defense on the cheap easier than possession and goal scoring?
 
Telegraph

This is a big weekend for Tottenham Hotspur and chairman Daniel Levy, whose lofty valuations of the club are set to be put to the ultimate test as the North London derby shares top billing with Anthony Joshua.

Some industry experts believe Levy is living in a fantasy land over the £3.5 billion he is said to have recently quoted at least one party that was interested in making a bid for the club.

And the £25 million-a-year naming rights deal Levy had been hoping to secure after Tottenham’s £1bn stadium was opened, late, almost two-and-a-half years ago has so far put off prospective buyers.

Joshua’s world heavyweight title fight against Oleksandr Usyk will put Spurs back on the sporting map at a time when they are very much an undercard attraction in the world of football.

Had Tottenham not fallen out of the Champions League a couple of years ago, the club would almost certainly not have been able to stage the Joshua fight on Saturday night.Anthony Joshua is fighting this weekend at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium

Not for the first time during Levy’s stewardship, Spurs fans could question where the club’s priorities lie during a weekend in which three points against Woolwich may not be the be-all and end-all.

Even though Tottenham’s retractable football pitch will be safely stored under the South Stand and will be looked after by robotic mowers and artificial lighting while Joshua goes toe-to-toe with Usyk, there is still a risk that the surface may not be perfect by the time Sloveian club NS Mura visit in the Europa Conference League next Thursday night.

It does not take an economist to calculate that, given the pulling power of NS Mura and Europe’s third-ranked competition, staging the Joshua fight so close to the tie was a gamble worth taking.

Aston Villa will be the next visitors just three days later, next Sunday, but Tottenham made it clear when announcing the Joshua fight in July that this is very much the future.

In a statement, Spurs boasted: “Tottenham Hotspur Stadium is not only the largest football club stadium in London, it is a multi-purpose venue, capable of hosting a range of events, 365 days a year - helping pump circa £300m into the local economy each year. Our stadium will host two back-to-back NFL London Games in October this year, with rugby and concerts scheduled for 2022, alongside Tottenham Hotspur football matches.”

Tottenham have so far used international breaks and the summer to schedule NFL and music concerts, all of which had to be cancelled or rescheduled during the coronavirus lockdown, but more events could be sandwiched into the Premier League fixture list if the Joshua fight passes without problems.

While three points and North London bragging rights are on offer at the Emirates, untold future riches could be at stake if Tottenham can help put on a show for a huge worldwide boxing audience on Saturday night and roll back out a pristine football surface in time for Thursday night.

That may not fill Spurs supporters with excitement, who want the football to be the box office attraction. But it may well represent the club’s best hope of trying to keep up financially with their rivals and encourage somebody wealthy enough to get close to meeting Levy’s valuations.

During the coronavirus shutdown, when supporters were not allowed inside stadiums, the idea of asking Tottenham’s billionaire owner Joe Lewis to invest some of his personal fortune to help balance the books is said to have been briefly considered.

But, unlike Roman Abramovich at Chelsea and Sheikh Mansour at Manchester City, Lewis is not prepared to bankroll Spurs and his self-sufficient business plan relies on investment from banks, supporters, sponsors and growing the club globally.

That is why the Amazon Prime cameras were allowed in to capture the final days of Mauricio Pochettino and why the appointment of Jose Mourinho, the most famous football manager on the planet, as his successor, together with the return of Gareth Bale on loan for a season, represented value off the pitch that perhaps outstripped their value on it.

The latest head coach, Nuno Espirito Santo, does not have the same pull, which was why it was so vital to secure South Korean superstar Heung-min Son to a new contract and hold on to England captain Harry Kane - for so long now the face of Spurs.

Just as his valuations of the club and the naming rights for the stadium have been questioned, Levy has faced scrutiny over his decision to turn down an offer worth £100m for Kane, who had made it clear he wanted to join Manchester City.

But if Kane can get off the mark in the Premier League to secure a victory over Woolwich, so soon after the Joshua fight, then Levy may well feel empowered in his belief that he can still demand top dollar for Tottenham and everything that goes with it.
 
Telegraph

This is a big weekend for Tottenham Hotspur and chairman Daniel Levy, whose lofty valuations of the club are set to be put to the ultimate test as the North London derby shares top billing with Anthony Joshua.

Some industry experts believe Levy is living in a fantasy land over the £3.5 billion he is said to have recently quoted at least one party that was interested in making a bid for the club.

And the £25 million-a-year naming rights deal Levy had been hoping to secure after Tottenham’s £1bn stadium was opened, late, almost two-and-a-half years ago has so far put off prospective buyers.

Joshua’s world heavyweight title fight against Oleksandr Usyk will put Spurs back on the sporting map at a time when they are very much an undercard attraction in the world of football.

Had Tottenham not fallen out of the Champions League a couple of years ago, the club would almost certainly not have been able to stage the Joshua fight on Saturday night.Anthony Joshua is fighting this weekend at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium

Not for the first time during Levy’s stewardship, Spurs fans could question where the club’s priorities lie during a weekend in which three points against Woolwich may not be the be-all and end-all.

Even though Tottenham’s retractable football pitch will be safely stored under the South Stand and will be looked after by robotic mowers and artificial lighting while Joshua goes toe-to-toe with Usyk, there is still a risk that the surface may not be perfect by the time Sloveian club NS Mura visit in the Europa Conference League next Thursday night.

It does not take an economist to calculate that, given the pulling power of NS Mura and Europe’s third-ranked competition, staging the Joshua fight so close to the tie was a gamble worth taking.

Aston Villa will be the next visitors just three days later, next Sunday, but Tottenham made it clear when announcing the Joshua fight in July that this is very much the future.

In a statement, Spurs boasted: “Tottenham Hotspur Stadium is not only the largest football club stadium in London, it is a multi-purpose venue, capable of hosting a range of events, 365 days a year - helping pump circa £300m into the local economy each year. Our stadium will host two back-to-back NFL London Games in October this year, with rugby and concerts scheduled for 2022, alongside Tottenham Hotspur football matches.”

Tottenham have so far used international breaks and the summer to schedule NFL and music concerts, all of which had to be cancelled or rescheduled during the coronavirus lockdown, but more events could be sandwiched into the Premier League fixture list if the Joshua fight passes without problems.

While three points and North London bragging rights are on offer at the Emirates, untold future riches could be at stake if Tottenham can help put on a show for a huge worldwide boxing audience on Saturday night and roll back out a pristine football surface in time for Thursday night.

That may not fill Spurs supporters with excitement, who want the football to be the box office attraction. But it may well represent the club’s best hope of trying to keep up financially with their rivals and encourage somebody wealthy enough to get close to meeting Levy’s valuations.

During the coronavirus shutdown, when supporters were not allowed inside stadiums, the idea of asking Tottenham’s billionaire owner Joe Lewis to invest some of his personal fortune to help balance the books is said to have been briefly considered.

But, unlike Roman Abramovich at Chelsea and Sheikh Mansour at Manchester City, Lewis is not prepared to bankroll Spurs and his self-sufficient business plan relies on investment from banks, supporters, sponsors and growing the club globally.

That is why the Amazon Prime cameras were allowed in to capture the final days of Mauricio Pochettino and why the appointment of Jose Mourinho, the most famous football manager on the planet, as his successor, together with the return of Gareth Bale on loan for a season, represented value off the pitch that perhaps outstripped their value on it.

The latest head coach, Nuno Espirito Santo, does not have the same pull, which was why it was so vital to secure South Korean superstar Heung-min Son to a new contract and hold on to England captain Harry Kane - for so long now the face of Spurs.

Just as his valuations of the club and the naming rights for the stadium have been questioned, Levy has faced scrutiny over his decision to turn down an offer worth £100m for Kane, who had made it clear he wanted to join Manchester City.

But if Kane can get off the mark in the Premier League to secure a victory over Woolwich, so soon after the Joshua fight, then Levy may well feel empowered in his belief that he can still demand top dollar for Tottenham and everything that goes with it.
Interesting stuff. Thanks for sharing.

Pretty much confirms what I've been saying all along.
 
A bit of a fact check on the Spurs bit at least. Ignores the coinage but the big ticket items show that to be shit. Problem is not really that we haven't spent. It's just that we've spent a lot of it on rubbish.
I don't expect us to compete with Man Citys spend - noone should.

Bought

Ndombele £55m
Sanchez £42m
Reguilon £32m
Sissoko £30m
Berwijn £26m
Royal £26m
Sessegnon £25m
Moura £25m
Aurier £23m
Son £22m
Gil £21m
Janssen £17m
Doherty £15m
Hojbjerg £15m
Alderweireld £11m
Wanyama £11m
Njie £8m
Dele £5m

£364m

Sold

Walker £50m
Trippier £20m
Wimmer £18m
Chadli £13m
Mason £13m
Walker Peters £12m
Sissoko £3m
N'Kooudou £4m
Janssen £6m
Pritchard £8m
Njie £6m
Stamboli £6m

£133m

NET £231m
Bought Wimmer for £4.3m, he only started 13 premier league games over 2 seasons ... sold in 2017 to Stoke for £18m :pochshock2:

(and he left Stoke this summer on a free transfer after only 14 league starts for them)
 
Last edited:
That sentence is genuinely worrying.
It definitely poses more questions than answers.

We need to stop burying our heads in the sand and accept that our football club, our football team, is very much a minor irrelevance in the grand scheme of ENIC.

We served our purpose in facilitating their goal. Now we're just like a little bit of shit stuck to their shoe as they use the club to facilitate their debt.
 
That sentence is genuinely worrying.

I am not sure it’s true. I think the author is getting confused with the amount of games allowed at the stadium and the amount of extra events which does have a cap, number of matches doesnt. Besides, how could us not being in the champions league mean we wouldn’t have events, that makes no sense at all. We are still in European competition yet having events, just because it’s the third rung one and not the first, is immaterial.
 
Back
Top