• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Mauricio Pochettino

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

To be honest when we have the ball our wing-backs do play like wingers.

I find it quite odd how close AVB was to getting the formula right.

He wanted to do exactly what Poch does; have inside forwards and use full backs to stretch the defence. The issue is, he also loved to play defensive football so the full backs weren't allowed to get forward or press, as they could put themselves out of position.

He got it 70%, but that 30% meant it all fell to pieces and looked awful.
 
Can you explain what you mean please?

pretty much what you already said.
Not sure if you're familiar with gibbsy but he always insisted we play trippier and rose on the actual wing with davies and walker behind them. He is now seeing Trippier and Davies' performance yesterday as vindication for his views.
However he doesn't quite get it that the system we play with the three guys behind the striker inverting/switching all the time is the key to the success of our full-backs forward movement. They have the space to run into thanks to the attacking players occupying defenders. They also have the freedom to do so because of the Dier plus 2CB behind them.
 
I find it quite odd how close AVB was to getting the formula right.

He wanted to do exactly what Poch does; have inside forwards and use full backs to stretch the defence. The issue is, he also loved to play defensive football so the full backs weren't allowed to get forward or press, as they could put themselves out of position.

He got it 70%, but that 30% meant it all fell to pieces and looked awful.

I agree.
I actually think the main difference is how the 2 midfielders in the 'pivot' behave in conjunction with the defence when we are attacking.

Under AVB, I fee like he wanted the full backs to get forward on the overlap, but relied on the two DMs to come across and cover the space they leave behind when they go. The problems with this were that a) both of them couldn't fully commit to an attack without the fear of having to chase back and b)the distance to get over from central to RB or LB can be too great to make up during a fast counter attack. c)this left a huge gap in the middle with CBs often left one on one with attackers

Where poch has it spot on is the CB split with Dier dropping between them. Jan/Wimmer and Toby are then playing as half CB, half full back if we get countered and are able to close up the space on the wings faster, allowing more time for the rest of the team to get back and defend.
 
To be honest when we have the ball our wing-backs do play like wingers. They help to stretch the defence so that our attacking players can find space. Plus, Davies and especially Trippier have a good cross on them.

I think any of our wing-backs could play on the right/left of midfield, as wingers. Trippier overlapping Walker on the right of a 4-4-2 would give most teams something to worry about - they'd be strong in defence as well as going forward, with a mix of pace and power with finesse and crossing ability. However we don't play that way, and our wing-backs aren't really suited to playing as inverted attacking players, at least not compared to those we already have in those positions.
Yes, but the difference is, that our forwards create space for the wingbacks to run into. It would be way different if he was played as an actual wing
 
pretty much what you already said.
Not sure if you're familiar with gibbsy but he always insisted we play trippier and rose on the actual wing with davies and walker behind them. He is now seeing Trippier and Davies' performance yesterday as vindication for his views.
However he doesn't quite get it that the system we play with the three guys behind the striker inverting/switching all the time is the key to the success of our full-backs forward movement. They have the space to run into thanks to the attacking players occupying defenders. They also have the freedom to do so because of the Dier plus 2CB behind them.
Thanks for clarifying, I think you're spot on
 
I find it quite odd how close AVB was to getting the formula right.

He wanted to do exactly what Poch does; have inside forwards and use full backs to stretch the defence. The issue is, he also loved to play defensive football so the full backs weren't allowed to get forward or press, as they could put themselves out of position.

He got it 70%, but that 30% meant it all fell to pieces and looked awful.
It's fine having a system, as long as it plays to your strengths.
At Chavs, he insisted on playing a high back line, but with some pretty slow defenders. The 3-5 v Goons a classic example, they were carved apart. Goons very rarely win at Slumford, but they murdered them that day.

With us, I wouldn't have been happy with playing that system with Brad and Dawson. Lloris is great, with his pace, but he wasn't an AVB buy and he wasn't even selected for the first part of the season.

His 2nd season was a disaster. A striker who couldn't hold the ball up (well, not the one that he selected); a bunch of buys none of which noted for pace (Capoue, Lamela, Paulinho, Holtby, Chiriches).

Having a plan is the easy bit, it's implementing it which is always the problem. I'd say it's taken about a season and a half for the team to fully implement Poch's tactics. Now it's looking very good, but there are times in the past when it hasn't.
 
Where poch has it spot on is the CB split with Dier dropping between them. Jan/Wimmer and Toby are then playing as half CB, half full back if we get countered and are able to close up the space on the wings faster, allowing more time for the rest of the team to get back and defend.
I don't really remember us doing this last season though. Is that because

- We didn't have the right personnel, with neither Bentaleb nor Mason really suited to dropping?

- It's a new system being tried by Poch this season?

- I am blind/thick/have a bad memory?
 
I don't really remember us doing this last season though. Is that because

- We didn't have the right personnel, with neither Bentaleb nor Mason really suited to dropping?

- It's a new system being tried by Poch this season?

- I am blind/thick/have a bad memory?


Bentaleb was supposed to be playing more like Dier is now imo.

It also didn't help that our defensive options were Kaboul and Fazio with no cover for right back other than Dier.

Fuck knows what we'll do next season if Poch is able to sign players to cover the minor gaps we have in the squad.
 


This guy has dedication, I will give him that. Slightly worrying it is all to wind us up. Could be a serial killer :pochrolleyes:


I thought about Ole Gibbsy, how he was saying that Rose and Trippier should play as wingers, when Trippier said in the post match interview that Poch wants them (the wingbacks) to play as wingers. I just know he would see that as him (gibbs) being right, when in fact he was as wrong as he pretty much always is.

Gibbs wanted them played as wingers (as in two of the three AMs in a 4-2-3-1), as opposed to how they are being played and have played pretty much all season, as more or less offensive wingbacks.
 
...is it so wrong that the first thing that came into my head was this???
CCAAd_ZWEAAzoOw.jpg


...and in case the ageing TV reference escaped you:
51JHQDKTTBL.jpg
 
Back
Top