• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Player Morgan Gibbs-White

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Status
Not open for further replies.
Plays it beautifully. Has every pass in the book and dictates games in a way only few can. This is why I favour a more destroyer type 6. Getting MGW will take players like maddison, kudus, johnson and solanke to higher levels.

This is very pleasing. It shows that we do have a plan. Kudus pre-Mgw was abit underwhelming for me but now it makes complete sense. Kudus will make runs and isolate his fullback and he will be found instantly. This also makes me believe even more that johnson will play left and his game will be all about runs in behind.

It's a great shame archie gray is not a year or 2 further along, because gray and MGW combined has mega potential and that's even without thinking of bergvall.

Get Palhinha, experienced ready now and Archie will learn from him
 


Probably most relevant bit to us is this
"Forest are not naive about the way these things work, but they are asking questions over how supposedly confidential details of Gibbs-White’s contract were seemingly known by Spurs, who offered the exact amount required to trigger his release. Tottenham declined to comment on the matter when approached by The Athletic.

The result of Forest’s complaints to the Premier League over what they believe to be an illegal approach and their threats of potential legal action may only ultimately delay things, rather than halt them. But they do not want to be seen to be easily allowing their most influential player to depart, at a time when they have just reluctantly sold Anthony Elanga to Newcastle United for £52million."
 
Its not always us. Every club has difficulties to close the deal one way or other. Look at Gyokeres issues with his club. If anything, Gibbs White to us is more of case of when not if.
He will definitely be leaving us, no doubt about it. The fact that he agreed terms with you so quickly shows he is keen on the move. Him and his Mrs love London, that ticks another box. All that needs sorting out now is the transfer. If there is no foul play then it should get resolved at some point during the week. If there is then I still think the deal is on the cards, just Marinakis might want paying a bit more to get it done. Lots to unpick but think its apparent Morgan wont play for us again. Will be interesting to see if he reports for training tomorrow as the international lot are back tomorrow morn.

The only risk is if another club comes in for him. But since hes agreed personal terms with you already (and the speed of which it appears to have happened), I think that also works in your favour as well.
 
I really want us to get him adn will be really disappointed if this falls through. Him alongside Bergvall in a double pivot would be incredible...

Vicario
Porro -- Romero -- VdV -- Udogie
Gibbs-White -- Bergvall
Kudus ----- Maddison ---Tel/Odobert
Solanke​
 
Think laterally about why I said it mate. Come on, you should be better than that.
I'm hoping this means you were joking and it was just lost in the written word?



Probably most relevant bit to us is this
"Forest are not naive about the way these things work, but they are asking questions over how supposedly confidential details of Gibbs-White’s contract were seemingly known by Spurs, who offered the exact amount required to trigger his release. Tottenham declined to comment on the matter when approached by The Athletic.

The result of Forest’s complaints to the Premier League over what they believe to be an illegal approach and their threats of potential legal action may only ultimately delay things, rather than halt them. But they do not want to be seen to be easily allowing their most influential player to depart, at a time when they have just reluctantly sold Anthony Elanga to Newcastle United for £52million."
How funny would it be if the "exact amount" was a nice round number, like, say, £60m
Cause let's be real, without a release clause, he's probably worth a fair bit more.
It's entirely conceivable that we would pick a round number, below market value to either make it look like we tried or start the ball rolling.
If it is, in fact a round number, it could just as easily be a total utter fluke.

If it was £61,738,219.73 then sure, we've been fed info
Not likely though, is it?
 
Plays it beautifully. Has every pass in the book and dictates games in a way only few can. This is why I favour a more destroyer type 6. Getting MGW will take players like maddison, kudus, johnson and solanke to higher levels.

This is very pleasing. It shows that we do have a plan. Kudus pre-Mgw was abit underwhelming for me but now it makes complete sense. Kudus will make runs and isolate his fullback and he will be found instantly. This also makes me believe even more that johnson will play left and his game will be all about runs in behind.

It's a great shame archie gray is not a year or 2 further along, because gray and MGW combined has mega potential and that's even without thinking of bergvall.

Gray is further along than people are giving him credit for.

They are associating his whole season last year with a few token performances at the end of free season playing #6 in a dysfunctional, heavily rotated team that lost games.

It’s all good though, they have short memories both ways and will forget those games pretty quickly this year.
 
Good post.

I'm not sure how a buy-out clause can ever remain secret. Once met however, I am unsure of the process that should be followed, or if it exclusive to the initial bidder.

Seems like the argument is all around that to be honest. If the player wants to leave and push it through then they may have to do something like dropping a loyalty bonus (which we will then presumably pick up at some point) to get it done. It will be either about money or saving face in the end. I’m sure news will come out suddenly in the next few days if Forest chill out and open up communication again. They have to really, the football market only really exists through cooperation. If forest want one of our players in the future then they won’t want this hanging over them. I caveat this post with their chairman behaviour etc being common knowledge.
 


Probably most relevant bit to us is this
"Forest are not naive about the way these things work, but they are asking questions over how supposedly confidential details of Gibbs-White’s contract were seemingly known by Spurs, who offered the exact amount required to trigger his release. Tottenham declined to comment on the matter when approached by The Athletic.

The result of Forest’s complaints to the Premier League over what they believe to be an illegal approach and their threats of potential legal action may only ultimately delay things, rather than halt them. But they do not want to be seen to be easily allowing their most influential player to depart, at a time when they have just reluctantly sold Anthony Elanga to Newcastle United for £52million."

“But they do not want to be seen to be easily allowing their most influential player to depart”

So they know he will depart but they want the optics to look better.


Cool. Just ignore the whole fuss and wait for him to be announced
 
Football agent Sky Andrew talking about the Morgan Gibbs-White situation (on talkSPORT)...

"A club that has the players registration has the right to demand the £60M upfront, not in installments. The buying club will have to pay the money in the terms what Forest want.
"Morgan Gibbs-White is a £100M player... It’s a case now how much will the club pay for the player and it won't be £60M, it will probably have to be more.
"Forest have to decide what they want to do as once a player says they want to leave its very difficult to keep the player at the club."


View: https://x.com/ChrisCowlin/status/1944298251714539921?t=fCEbFAXL_BkQ2opx-EP4cw&s=19
 
Fee was £25m + add-ons.
And Wolves replaced him with Nunes...

During the early stages of the 2023–24 season, Nunes began a dispute with Wolves over his desire to leave the club after they had rejected a transfer bid for him worth £47 million from Manchester City.

Nunes failed to turn up for training with the club, without the permission of manager Gary O'Neil for two consecutive days in a bid to secure a move away from the club, and was subsequently fined
 
Football agent Sky Andrew talking about the Morgan Gibbs-White situation (on talkSPORT)...

"A club that has the players registration has the right to demand the £60M upfront, not in installments. The buying club will have to pay the money in the terms what Forest want.
"Morgan Gibbs-White is a £100M player... It’s a case now how much will the club pay for the player and it won't be £60M, it will probably have to be more.
"Forest have to decide what they want to do as once a player says they want to leave its very difficult to keep the player at the club."


View: https://x.com/ChrisCowlin/status/1944298251714539921?t=fCEbFAXL_BkQ2opx-EP4cw&s=19


That prick can shut the fuck up. The player’s contract will deem how the fee is paid, it won’t all of a sudden change to having to be paid in one go. That’s not how legal documents work.
 
Football agent Sky Andrew talking about the Morgan Gibbs-White situation (on talkSPORT)...

"A club that has the players registration has the right to demand the £60M upfront, not in installments. The buying club will have to pay the money in the terms what Forest want.
"Morgan Gibbs-White is a £100M player... It’s a case now how much will the club pay for the player and it won't be £60M, it will probably have to be more.
"Forest have to decide what they want to do as once a player says they want to leave its very difficult to keep the player at the club."


View: https://x.com/ChrisCowlin/status/1944298251714539921?t=fCEbFAXL_BkQ2opx-EP4cw&s=19


This Forest owner is playing with fire.

If he tries to create and make demands that are seen as entirely excessive, then Forest will undoubtedly be the losers, even if they keep Gibbs-White in the short term.

He might be well-served to just consider the broader context
 
I'm hoping this means you were joking and it was just lost in the written word?


How funny would it be if the "exact amount" was a nice round number, like, say, £60m
Cause let's be real, without a release clause, he's probably worth a fair bit more.
It's entirely conceivable that we would pick a round number, below market value to either make it look like we tried or start the ball rolling.
If it is, in fact a round number, it could just as easily be a total utter fluke.

If it was £61,738,219.73 then sure, we've been fed info
Not likely though, is it?

Mate, think as you wish.

I'm trying to be as diplomatic as possible but it was all within the written word.

It's not me who might be beginning to lose credibility..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top